![[22/09, 15:22] Sekarreporter: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxkpO0jRlMRBquhe0rcdR809BVLM9GGWi_?si=ZurWN06bTdi_3ikt [22/09, 15:22] Sekarreporter: Dmk files Annmalai மீது டிஆர் பாலு வழக்கு / இன்று டி ஆர் பாலுவிடம் இரண்டரை மணி நேரம் குறுக்கு விசாரணை செய்த பாஜக மாநிலத் துணைத் தலைவர் ஆர் சி பால்ஐனகராஜ்](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Stating that legal profession should not be treated as an instant money earning machine, Chief Justice of the Madras high court Amreshwar Pratap Sahi exhorted graduating students of the Tamil Nadu National Law University (TNNLU) in Trichy to make the profession a service to mankind.
- Previous story HC recalls order after advocate alleges injustice in open court –
Recent Posts
- I regret I could not elevate any woman judge to Supreme Court: CJI Gavai Read here: barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
- Law Officers – Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department Engagement of Senior Counsels to defend the cases on behalf of the Government of Tamil Nadu and Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department in Supreme Court of India and High Courts – Panel of Senior Counsels — Approved — Orders – Issued.
- In the light of the above, we are not inclined to interfere with the findings of the learned Single Judge insofar as declaring the relief of declaration as barred by limitation, while setting aside the finding that the suit in its entirety is barred by limitation. Consequently, the original side appeal is partly allowed remanding the matter back to the learned Single Judge for adjudicating the suit on merits excluding the relief of declaration and to decide other issues are concerned. We make it clear that any of the observations made in this order, shall not be construed as holding the relief of permanent injunction as the one within the period of limitation and it is open for the learned Single Judge to examine the same as to the entitlement or otherwise of the plaintiff for relief of permanent injunction as sought for under relief at Paragraph No.9(b) of the plaint. Taking into consideration the fact that the suit is of the year 2014, we request the learned Single Judge to dispose of the matter on priority basis as expeditiously as possible. 28. Accordingly, the appeal is partly allowed. Connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. No costs. (Dr.G.J.,J.) (M.S.K.,J.) 19.11.2025 dpa Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes / No Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J. and MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J. dpa Pre-Delivery Order made in OSA (CAD) No.20 of 2022 19.11.2025
- Cbi ordered THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR W.P.Crl.No.1361 of 2025 Canara Bank,
- Justice G.R. Swaminathan presiding over the matter, reproduced Section 62 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, which deals with assessment of non-filers. Sub-section (2) specifies that if a registered person furnishes a valid return within thirty days of the assessment order issued under Section62(1), the assessment “shall be deemed to have been withdrawn.”
More
Recent Posts
- I regret I could not elevate any woman judge to Supreme Court: CJI Gavai Read here: barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
- Law Officers – Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department Engagement of Senior Counsels to defend the cases on behalf of the Government of Tamil Nadu and Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department in Supreme Court of India and High Courts – Panel of Senior Counsels — Approved — Orders – Issued.
- In the light of the above, we are not inclined to interfere with the findings of the learned Single Judge insofar as declaring the relief of declaration as barred by limitation, while setting aside the finding that the suit in its entirety is barred by limitation. Consequently, the original side appeal is partly allowed remanding the matter back to the learned Single Judge for adjudicating the suit on merits excluding the relief of declaration and to decide other issues are concerned. We make it clear that any of the observations made in this order, shall not be construed as holding the relief of permanent injunction as the one within the period of limitation and it is open for the learned Single Judge to examine the same as to the entitlement or otherwise of the plaintiff for relief of permanent injunction as sought for under relief at Paragraph No.9(b) of the plaint. Taking into consideration the fact that the suit is of the year 2014, we request the learned Single Judge to dispose of the matter on priority basis as expeditiously as possible. 28. Accordingly, the appeal is partly allowed. Connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. No costs. (Dr.G.J.,J.) (M.S.K.,J.) 19.11.2025 dpa Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes / No Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J. and MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J. dpa Pre-Delivery Order made in OSA (CAD) No.20 of 2022 19.11.2025
- Cbi ordered THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR W.P.Crl.No.1361 of 2025 Canara Bank,
- Justice G.R. Swaminathan presiding over the matter, reproduced Section 62 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, which deals with assessment of non-filers. Sub-section (2) specifies that if a registered person furnishes a valid return within thirty days of the assessment order issued under Section62(1), the assessment “shall be deemed to have been withdrawn.”