Follow:
- Next story hosted by NKM Law –Women, the Supreme Court and the Constitution” – Analyzing the march of Law– Bhati, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India
- Previous story Madras high court to reopen on June 1; judges to attend court but hearing to be held through videoconferencing –
Recent Posts
- HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.Nos.29753 & 29755 of 2019 & W.M.P.Nos .29654, 29885, 29886, 29883 of 2019, 7600 & 7592 of 2025 Anant Mandgi … Petitioner in both petitions Vs. 1.Union of India, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways,
- [13/03, 16:09] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxpDjQduI8VJcOUgCMaZhIOyeZL-dJVK5Y?si=mj2cQj6yqNxLnu61 [13/03, 16:09] sekarreporter1: [13/03, 16:07] sekarreporter1: [13/03, 16:06] sekarreporter1: Today evening 5 o clock mhc women govt Advts women’s day celebration judge p t asha j and kalai mathi j [13/03, 16:06] sekarreporter1: 👍 [13/03, 16:08] sekarreporter1: SGP maitherayan and otgers [13/03, 16:09] Meta AI: இன்று மாலை 5 மணிக்கு சென்னை HC-யில் பெண்கள் அரசு வழக்கறிஞர்கள் சார்பில் மகளிர் தினக் கொண்டாட்டம்—நீதிபதிகள் P.T. ஆஷா, கலைமதி பங்கேற்கிறார்கள். SGP மைதரேயன் உள்ளிட்டவர்களும் இடம்பெற்றுள்ளனர். [13/03, 16:10] sekarreporter1: Auditorium mhc [13/03, 16:10] Meta AI: மதறாஸ் HC-யின் ஆடிடோரியம்—அங்கு தான் இன்று பெண்கள் அரசு வழக்கறிஞர்கள் மகளிர் தின நிகழ்ச்சி நடந்தது.
- 13/03, 15:08] sekarreporter1: “Justice N. Anand Venkatesh and Justice P. Dhanabal observed, “Just because A1 happened to be the wife of the deceased, it cannot be assumed that she will always be present with the deceased inside the house. Some witness had to necessarily speak about her presence in the house prior to the incident or atleast the previous day, since the incident is said to have
- GRSJ /I do not believe in adjournment culture and the proceedings will conclude one way or the other before the month end. Let me remind that if reckless comments are made by dignitaries, they also will be roped in. Before law all are one and no one can claim immunity merely because they happen to hold high offices. 04.03.2026
- Nakkheeran Gopal’s PIL (WP 6087/2026) against the proviso to BNSS Section 223 came up before the First Bench; notice ordered. He’s also filed a criminal defamation complaint against Jaggi Vasudev and 14 others. He argues the proviso—requiring an accused’s opportunity before cognizance—is redundant, delays justice, and is vague compared to old CrPC Sec 200.
More
Recent Posts
- HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.Nos.29753 & 29755 of 2019 & W.M.P.Nos .29654, 29885, 29886, 29883 of 2019, 7600 & 7592 of 2025 Anant Mandgi … Petitioner in both petitions Vs. 1.Union of India, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways,
- [13/03, 16:09] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxpDjQduI8VJcOUgCMaZhIOyeZL-dJVK5Y?si=mj2cQj6yqNxLnu61 [13/03, 16:09] sekarreporter1: [13/03, 16:07] sekarreporter1: [13/03, 16:06] sekarreporter1: Today evening 5 o clock mhc women govt Advts women’s day celebration judge p t asha j and kalai mathi j [13/03, 16:06] sekarreporter1: 👍 [13/03, 16:08] sekarreporter1: SGP maitherayan and otgers [13/03, 16:09] Meta AI: இன்று மாலை 5 மணிக்கு சென்னை HC-யில் பெண்கள் அரசு வழக்கறிஞர்கள் சார்பில் மகளிர் தினக் கொண்டாட்டம்—நீதிபதிகள் P.T. ஆஷா, கலைமதி பங்கேற்கிறார்கள். SGP மைதரேயன் உள்ளிட்டவர்களும் இடம்பெற்றுள்ளனர். [13/03, 16:10] sekarreporter1: Auditorium mhc [13/03, 16:10] Meta AI: மதறாஸ் HC-யின் ஆடிடோரியம்—அங்கு தான் இன்று பெண்கள் அரசு வழக்கறிஞர்கள் மகளிர் தின நிகழ்ச்சி நடந்தது.
- 13/03, 15:08] sekarreporter1: “Justice N. Anand Venkatesh and Justice P. Dhanabal observed, “Just because A1 happened to be the wife of the deceased, it cannot be assumed that she will always be present with the deceased inside the house. Some witness had to necessarily speak about her presence in the house prior to the incident or atleast the previous day, since the incident is said to have
- GRSJ /I do not believe in adjournment culture and the proceedings will conclude one way or the other before the month end. Let me remind that if reckless comments are made by dignitaries, they also will be roped in. Before law all are one and no one can claim immunity merely because they happen to hold high offices. 04.03.2026
- Nakkheeran Gopal’s PIL (WP 6087/2026) against the proviso to BNSS Section 223 came up before the First Bench; notice ordered. He’s also filed a criminal defamation complaint against Jaggi Vasudev and 14 others. He argues the proviso—requiring an accused’s opportunity before cognizance—is redundant, delays justice, and is vague compared to old CrPC Sec 200.