You may also like...
-
Justice G R Swaminathan said that in the present case the vehicle is yet to be produced before the jurisdictional court and hence the writ court definitely has the power to direct release of the vehicle. The judge said that neither the petitioner nor the vehicle is involved in any previous case of the same nature. The counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remit a sum of Rs 20,000 as non-refundable cost for release of the vehicle.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 23, 2021
-
GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* *HOLIDAY IS A LUXURY AND THE GST DEPARTMENT DOES NOT RECOGNISE THE CONCEPTS OF “WORKING DAY” AND “HOLIDAY”* -Dr. Justice Anita Sumanth The *Hon’ble Justice Dr. Anita Sumanth* has allowed W.P. No. 22646 of 2022 in D.K. Enterprises vs. Assistant/Deputy Commissioner (ST) Adjudication, Intelligence, Chennai and directed the respondents to release the life saving drug namely polystardone XL-IO on the ground that the Department has not passed the order of detention within seven days of detention or seizure under proviso to sub-section 1 of section 129 of the CGST Act, 1997 and no show cause notice issued under section 129(3) of the CGST Act, 1997 and held as follows:
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 25, 2022
-
Centre approves 27% OBC, 10% EWS quota in medical courses
by Sekar Reporter · Published July 30, 2021