![Unprecedented Suit for damages filed by I.F.S. Officer against I.A.S. Officers for Rupees One Crore and One Thousand as token damage. Plaintiff: D.Ramachandran IFS (V.Retd) Through Counsel M.Ravi & Priya Ravi Summons issued by High Court, Madras IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS [ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISIDICTION] C.S.NO. OF 2021 Prof. Dr. A. Ramachandran, Ph.D., D.Sc.,I.F.S., (Retd.) (M,64) No.96/76, Greenways Extension Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai – 600 028. … Plaintiff](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Chandrasekar Mhc Advt: CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY inviting you to a lecture on DISTRICT JUDGE EXAMINATION – 2020 Subject : The Indian registration act 1908 BY: R. CHANDRASEKARAN ADVOCATE Date: 29th July 2020
- Previous story Madras HC’s first all women Full Bench of Justices Pushpa Sathyanarayana, Anita Sumanth & P.T. Asha rules that the ESI Act is applicable to both aided and unaided private educational institutions https://t.co/ImKwFsIxuA
Recent Posts
- this Court painfully notices an alarming trend in certain cases involving allegations against fathers, wherein some officials attached to the Child Welfare Committee, shelter homes, or even police personnel appear to insist upon or induce the child victims
- , Sreeradha, a member of the Bar and a woman contestant in the Tamil Nadu and Puducherry Bar Council elections held on 30.03.2026, have approached hon’ble madras high Court to
- [14/05, 12:47] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2054823095282946516 [14/05, 12:47] sekarreporter1: Only the Advocate General & Additional Solicitor General enjoy the privilege of being allotted offices right in the heritage building of the #MadrasHighCourt All other law officers get accommodated in a separate building located a few metres away from the heritage building. Mr. Vijay Narayan assumed charge as the Advocate General at his office today.
- sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxxjJ4kBx04BhjZeY9-3Qlznfmi0ff2-lH?si=Yfu5HUHlf7ieRfHW [14/05, 11:48] sekarreporter1: [14/05, 11:41] Ps Raman Senior Advt: As I demit the office of AG today I would like to place on record the support and cooperation from you in the discharge of our respective offices. I leave with a gratifying testimony of a clear conscience and a sense of fulfillment and
- Madras HC allowed a woman to add her foster parents’ names with _“foster”_ tag to birth certificate while keeping biological parents’ names intact. Court said dignity + identity = fundamental right, and mismatch in documents can’t jeopardize education/career.
More
Recent Posts
- this Court painfully notices an alarming trend in certain cases involving allegations against fathers, wherein some officials attached to the Child Welfare Committee, shelter homes, or even police personnel appear to insist upon or induce the child victims
- , Sreeradha, a member of the Bar and a woman contestant in the Tamil Nadu and Puducherry Bar Council elections held on 30.03.2026, have approached hon’ble madras high Court to
- [14/05, 12:47] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2054823095282946516 [14/05, 12:47] sekarreporter1: Only the Advocate General & Additional Solicitor General enjoy the privilege of being allotted offices right in the heritage building of the #MadrasHighCourt All other law officers get accommodated in a separate building located a few metres away from the heritage building. Mr. Vijay Narayan assumed charge as the Advocate General at his office today.
- sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxxjJ4kBx04BhjZeY9-3Qlznfmi0ff2-lH?si=Yfu5HUHlf7ieRfHW [14/05, 11:48] sekarreporter1: [14/05, 11:41] Ps Raman Senior Advt: As I demit the office of AG today I would like to place on record the support and cooperation from you in the discharge of our respective offices. I leave with a gratifying testimony of a clear conscience and a sense of fulfillment and
- Madras HC allowed a woman to add her foster parents’ names with _“foster”_ tag to birth certificate while keeping biological parents’ names intact. Court said dignity + identity = fundamental right, and mismatch in documents can’t jeopardize education/career.