Mhc advocate vinothpandian law tips today

[12/28, 10:03] Vinothpandian: AIR 2010 SC 3540 : neeta rakesh jain vs Rakesh jeetmal jain : section 24 of the hindu marriage act provides a provision for grant of maintaineance pendente lite and expenses of proceedings
[12/28, 10:03] Vinothpandian: 2010 (4) SCC 409 : vikram kumar vohra vs shalini bhalla : welfare of child is of paramount consideration for courts in matters relating to custody of child
[12/28, 10:03] Vinothpandian: 2009 (4) SCC 366 : sipra bhattacharya vs dr Apaves bhattacharya : court is duty bound to dispose of pending application for enhancement of maintenance before suit for divorce is decided
[12/28, 10:03] Vinothpandian: 2010 (10) SCC 314 : shyamrao maroti korwate vs deepak kisanrao tekam : court while considering a matter relating to custody of minor child , must consider welfare of minor as paramount consideration and not rights of parents or relative under statute
[12/29, 11:37] Vinothpandian: 1988 SCC ( cri ) 104 : Tulsi Ram vs state of MP : It is no use turning to dictionaries , dictionaries give variegated meanings to words , dictionary meaning are variegated meaning depends on context
[12/29, 11:37] Vinothpandian: 1997 (2) SCC 53 : KV muthu vs Angamuthu ammal ; where a dictionary meaning defeats or is likely to defeat the purpose of the act , that meaning is to be ignored and only that meaning is to be accepted that favours legislative intention
[12/29, 11:37] Vinothpandian: AIR 1968 SC 870 : Ishwarlal vs state of gujarat : Dictionaries and reports of foreign cases , held not safe guides , safest guide is the statute itself