Skip to content

Primary Menu

Home
Gallery
Contact Us

Search for:

Home
Uncategorized
Mba kamalnathan birthday

Uncategorized

Mba kamalnathan birthday

By Sekar Reporter 2 months ago

Continue Reading

Previous 3/3, 11:59] Sekarreporter1: [3/3, 11:57] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1366997846797418500?s=08 [3/3, 11:57] Sekarreporter1: Former judge Karnan bail adj march 9 th judge v barathidasan https://t.co/eC0rLCFfMI [3/3, 12:04] Sekarreporter1: [3/3, 12:04] Sekarreporter1:

Next [3/3, 15:57] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1367058789397012480?s=08 [3/3, 15:57] Sekarreporter1: [3/3, 15:55] Sekarreporter1: Manikumar cj sister passed away [3/3, 15:55] Sekarreporter1: .

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment

Name *

Email *

Website

Search for:

Recent Posts

Justice V Parthiban said a writ court is not a proper forum to settle a dispute of this nature involving interpretation of contractual terms and agreement and adjudication of the rival claims. MKU had in 2014 entered into an agreement with Coimbatore-based Set Infotect Pvt Ltd for creation of an e-learning portal and development of digital content for the directorate of distance education. On completion of the project stage-wise, the company forwarded the bills from time to time which were settled by the university.
Sekarreporter1: ☘️ [4/18, 21:50] K. Selvaraj Mhc Advt: *19.04.’21, LAW NOTES:* *7)* *Favouritism, Malice or
Sekarreporter1: ☘️ [4/18, 21:50] K. Selvaraj Mhc Advt: *19.04.’21, LAW NOTES:* *7)* *Favouritism, Malice or Malafide*
Justices T S Sivagnanam and S Ananthi said they do not agree with the submissions of petitioner Muthukaruppan’s counsel that the petition was filed by his client in his private capacity and he has every right to withdraw it.
Justice Anitha Sumanth said that the tabulation of payments, in this case, is joint, the petitioner offering a sum of Rupees Seven Crores (since retracted) and the Officer to ascertain the balance. This exercise has not been carried out and, with this, the requirement of ‘ascertainment’ under Section 74(5), fails

Recent Posts

Justice V Parthiban said a writ court is not a proper forum to settle a dispute of this nature involving interpretation of contractual terms and agreement and adjudication of the rival claims. MKU had in 2014 entered into an agreement with Coimbatore-based Set Infotect Pvt Ltd for creation of an e-learning portal and development of digital content for the directorate of distance education. On completion of the project stage-wise, the company forwarded the bills from time to time which were settled by the university.
Sekarreporter1: ☘️ [4/18, 21:50] K. Selvaraj Mhc Advt: *19.04.’21, LAW NOTES:* *7)* *Favouritism, Malice or
Sekarreporter1: ☘️ [4/18, 21:50] K. Selvaraj Mhc Advt: *19.04.’21, LAW NOTES:* *7)* *Favouritism, Malice or Malafide*
Justices T S Sivagnanam and S Ananthi said they do not agree with the submissions of petitioner Muthukaruppan’s counsel that the petition was filed by his client in his private capacity and he has every right to withdraw it.
Justice Anitha Sumanth said that the tabulation of payments, in this case, is joint, the petitioner offering a sum of Rupees Seven Crores (since retracted) and the Officer to ascertain the balance. This exercise has not been carried out and, with this, the requirement of ‘ascertainment’ under Section 74(5), fails

Copyright © All rights reserved. | Magazine 7 by AF themes.

CALL ME