You may also like...
-
Justice P.N. Prakash said he did not find any manifest illegality in the order passed by a judicial magistrate court in Salem in 2012 and confirmed by a sessions court in 2014 while dismissing a revision petition preferred by the man under Section 397 of the CrPC. The judge pointed out that an order by a judicial or metropolitan magistrate for payment of monthly maintenance to parents, wife or children could be challenged by way of a criminal revision petition either before a High Court or a sessions court.
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 25, 2020
-
Crl.O.P.No.16952 of 2021 V.BHARATHIDASAN.J., [This matter has been heard through video conference] This Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent to register the complaint given by the petitioner dated 15.07.2021, which was received in CSR No. Not Known of 2021 on the file of the respondent.
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 20, 2022
-
HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WMP(MD) NO. 17716 of 2025 and WP(MD) NO. 22596 OF 2025 Venkatesh Sowrirajan S/o V.Sowrirajan, 3/106 South Madavilagam, Thirukkanapuram, Nagapattinam District Pincode 609 704 Petitioner(s) Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Addl Chief Secretary,
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 29, 2025