![[17/11, 19:25] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/LiveLawIndia/status/1990317105158509019?t=Q2MW-l39q-AE2Yn2nrW2Yg&s=08 [17/11, 19:25] Sekarreporter: The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear on November 19 a challenge to the order of the Madras High Court, which refused to allow medical admission of a candidate who could not complete the fee payment in time. According to the candidate, she could not make the payment due to financial difficulties. Read more: zurl.co/YmF38 #SupremeCourt #NEETUG](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Zoom meeting Mr. Justice* *S. Vaidyanathan,* Judge, Madras High Court
- Previous story Madras high court independence day photos
Recent Posts
- Admk distributed are not ordinary pamphlets or campaign notices, but are specifically designed in the form of cheque leaves, closely resembling financial instruments ordinarily used for payment, thereby creating a clear and immediate impression of monetary benefit in the minds of voters. I submit that these cheque-like materials prominently display monetary amounts such as ₹2,000/- and ₹10,000/-, which are capable of conveying to an ordinary voter that some form of financial benefit is being offered, promised or associated with electoral support./
- Ever since the #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice’s Bench called for the response of Director General of Income Tax (Investigation) regarding the assets declared by Tamil Nadu Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin, nine more similar cases have been filed regarding the assets declared by BJP candidate Vanathi Srinivasan, AIADMK candidates D. Jayakumar, C.Ve. Shanmugam, R.B. Udhayakumar, Dindigul C. Sreenivasan and P. Thangamani and TVK leader Aadhav Arjuna too. These petitions are in addition to those filed regarding the assets of TVK president C. Joseph Vijay and BJP former State president Tamilisai Soundararajan
- Madras HC partly sets aside a section 74 order that imposed a higher tax liability of (18%) with interest and penalty on Assessee after denying concessional rate of duty (5%) on “transport of goods in vessel” and “time charter of
- Case against Rayapuram mano mhc order for petner senior advt Nishar counsel. Advt shyamkumar for ec niranjan for admk Naveen kumar moorthy advt
- Acter case
More
Recent Posts
- Admk distributed are not ordinary pamphlets or campaign notices, but are specifically designed in the form of cheque leaves, closely resembling financial instruments ordinarily used for payment, thereby creating a clear and immediate impression of monetary benefit in the minds of voters. I submit that these cheque-like materials prominently display monetary amounts such as ₹2,000/- and ₹10,000/-, which are capable of conveying to an ordinary voter that some form of financial benefit is being offered, promised or associated with electoral support./
- Ever since the #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice’s Bench called for the response of Director General of Income Tax (Investigation) regarding the assets declared by Tamil Nadu Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin, nine more similar cases have been filed regarding the assets declared by BJP candidate Vanathi Srinivasan, AIADMK candidates D. Jayakumar, C.Ve. Shanmugam, R.B. Udhayakumar, Dindigul C. Sreenivasan and P. Thangamani and TVK leader Aadhav Arjuna too. These petitions are in addition to those filed regarding the assets of TVK president C. Joseph Vijay and BJP former State president Tamilisai Soundararajan
- Madras HC partly sets aside a section 74 order that imposed a higher tax liability of (18%) with interest and penalty on Assessee after denying concessional rate of duty (5%) on “transport of goods in vessel” and “time charter of
- Case against Rayapuram mano mhc order for petner senior advt Nishar counsel. Advt shyamkumar for ec niranjan for admk Naveen kumar moorthy advt
- Acter case