![9/22, 07:57] Sekarreporter1: [9/22, 07:56] Sekarreporter1: *GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* *V. Anusha Vs. B. Krishnan* A.Nos. 335 & 703 of 2021 and A.No.2011 of 2021 in O.P.No.443 of 2021 Dated: 16.09.2022 *Honourable Mr. Justice Krishnan Ramasamy* disposed the Applications in the Original Petition in the matter relating to *“Children – Custody](https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story JUDICIAL EXAMINATION/ APP* class today by candru law acadamy
- Previous story The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on Friday dispensed with the appearance of Film Producer K.E. Gnanavel Raja before the Ramanathapuram police for inquiry in connection with a chit fund scam, after the court was informed that he had tested positive for COVID-19 Justice V. Bharathidasan took cognisance of the fact that the film producer had appeared before the police on August 7 and 8 for inquiry. Vijayan Subramanian counsel for Gnanavelraja informed the court that he could not appear before the police after that as he had tested positive for COVID-19. The court adjourned the hearing in the case to August 27. The petitioner counsel vijayan Subramanian said that he had nothing to do with the chit fund scam or the people involved in the scam. He was not aware of the fact that the people who had acquired the theatrical rights of a film produced by him were involved in the scam, he said. He said that Neethimani who had acquired the theatrical rights of the film Magamuni, his wife Menaka and one, Anand were named accused in the scam based on a complaint lodged by Thulasimanigandan. Thulasimanigandan and 58 others had invested ₹3 crore in the chit fund and the amount was not repaid. The judge also sought a response from the police in connection with the involvement of Raja in this case and adjourned the case to August 27 for further hearing, till then interim order extended.
Recent Posts
- s M subramaniyam judge order/ In view of the fact that the petitioners have admittedly signed the bond and accepted the terms and conditions stipulated therein, they are not entitled to claim any concession for further reduction of period stipulated under the bond conditions. Therefore, the petitioners have to serve in Government Medical College and Hospitals as per the appointment order in compliance with the conditions and after completion of the period stipulated, appropriate decision may be taken by the respondents.
- TN govt informs #MadrasHighCourt the TN Heritage Commission (Amendment) Act, 2017 has been notified on March 1, 2024 and has come into effect from then on; the submission was made before first bench led by CJ SV Gangapurwala when a PIL on the matter came up for hearing @xpresstn
- In the W.P No 11463 of 2024 . The Writ Petition was Allowed in the favour of Petitioner
- [26/04, 12:21] sekarreporter1: Petitioner Name: A. Sathya Prakash Advocate.
- [26/04, 12:14] sekarreporter1: #JUSTIN || பிரதமர் மோடிக்கு எதிராக வழக்கு – 29ம் தேதிக்கு தள்ளிவைப்பு
More
Recent Posts
- s M subramaniyam judge order/ In view of the fact that the petitioners have admittedly signed the bond and accepted the terms and conditions stipulated therein, they are not entitled to claim any concession for further reduction of period stipulated under the bond conditions. Therefore, the petitioners have to serve in Government Medical College and Hospitals as per the appointment order in compliance with the conditions and after completion of the period stipulated, appropriate decision may be taken by the respondents.
- TN govt informs #MadrasHighCourt the TN Heritage Commission (Amendment) Act, 2017 has been notified on March 1, 2024 and has come into effect from then on; the submission was made before first bench led by CJ SV Gangapurwala when a PIL on the matter came up for hearing @xpresstn
- In the W.P No 11463 of 2024 . The Writ Petition was Allowed in the favour of Petitioner
- [26/04, 12:21] sekarreporter1: Petitioner Name: A. Sathya Prakash Advocate.
- [26/04, 12:14] sekarreporter1: #JUSTIN || பிரதமர் மோடிக்கு எதிராக வழக்கு – 29ம் தேதிக்கு தள்ளிவைப்பு