You may also like...
-
Cont.P.No.2111 of 2022 and Sub.Appl.No.522 of 2022 in WP.No.25213 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. This contempt petition has been filed to punish the respondents for the wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in WP.No.25213 of 2022 dated 22.09.2022, thereby this Court directed the respondents to grant permission to conduct procession and to conduct public meetings on 02.10.2022 at various places of Tamilnadu subject to the conditions on or before 28.09.2022. S.Prabakaran, the learned Senior Counsel appearing However, it is for the State to maintain law and order problem. It is made clear that the respondents shall permit the petitioners on their earlier representations to conduct procession and to conduct public meetings on 06.11.2022. Registry is directed to list the matter along with all the connected contempt petitions numbered subsequently on 31.10.2022. 30.09.2022 .
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 12, 2022
-
-
judges said that the police had failed to obtain CCTV footage from the ATMs and hence it would be difficult to accept the theory of the police, especially when it was their own case that the prime accused was an agriculturist and also the owner of a tourist cab. As far as the five assailants were concerned, the judges concluded that they were guilty because of their fatal overt acts. [6/23, 08:58] Sekarreporter 1: RT.No.3/2017 & Crl.A.Nos.162 to 165 & 183/2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on: 18.03.2020 Delivered on: 22.06.2020 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Referred Trial No.3 of 2017 and Crl.A.Nos.162 to 165 of 2018 and 183 of 2018 Crl.A.Nos.162 to 165 of 2018
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 23, 2020