Follow:
- Next story Justice Anand Venkatesh, however, dismissed the plea as premature and on mere apprehensions. The Judge observed that converting a residence into a memorial was not something new and that it had happened in cases of various leaders who had earned the love and respect of the people. The Tamil Nadu government on Wednesday informed the the Madras High Court that it is also actively considering converting “Veda Nilayam”, the residence of late AIADMK supremo J Jayalalithaa at upscale Poes Garden, into the official residence of the Chief Minister. Advocate General Vijay Narayan submitted before Justice Anand Venkatesh that the government would be acquiring not only the immovable property but also the movables to make as it was during the times of the late chief minister. The submission was made during the hearing of a plea of a residents association against converting Jayalalithaa’s residence into a memorial.
- Previous story methodology adopted by Tamil Nadu generation and distribution corporation (Tangedco) for calculating power consumption charges during the period of COVID-19 lockdown from March 25, when meter readings could not be noted down. Justices M.M. Sundresh and R. Hemalatha rejected the case filed by M.L. Ravi of Desiya Makkal Sakthi Katchi and held that the methodology was “reasonable and justified”. They agreed with Additional Advocate General P.H. Arvindh Pandian that “any other methodology, especially the one suggested by the petitioner, would not ensure equality.”
Recent Posts
- ] sekarreporter1: https://youtube.com/shorts/u7AWx2aB2tk?si=FX6ZAKyFm3mn06WO [08/03, 03:56] sekarreporter1: -: WOMAN ’ S MARATHON IN LAW :- By Daniel Mary, Advocate Women today face multitude of cultural, socio economic challenges
- [07/03, 22:04] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxG4bzV47kiT0KZ6ut0NCHmaKR5-aXXPFH?si=uLsUnVWHiusMebHm [07/03, 22:04] sekarreporter1: madurai saravanakumar advocate: Justice V Bharathidasan elderson marriage invitation [07/03, 21:21] saravanakumar advocate: Swamimalai Murugan Temple kumbakonam tomorrow morning [07/03, 21:22] sekarreporter1: 👍
- Trade mark order HON’BLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU OSA(CAD) No. 1 of 2025 & C.M.P.No. 7 of 2025 M/s.J.R.K’s Research and Pharmaceuticals Pvt.Ltd
- 43.In fine, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the judgment dated 11.10.2022 in O.S.No.23 of 2022 passed by the Tamil Nadu Waqf Tribunal at Chennai, is set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. Connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 27.02.2026
- The learned Additional Government Pleader (HR&CE) appearing for the respondents 8 to 10 is directed to find out whether any illegal encroachment persists in the temple property and if any illegal encroachment is made, the said encroachment shall be evicted and a report to that effect shall be filed by the respondents 8 to 10 before this Court on 12.03.2026. Post on 12.03.2026.
More
Recent Posts
- ] sekarreporter1: https://youtube.com/shorts/u7AWx2aB2tk?si=FX6ZAKyFm3mn06WO [08/03, 03:56] sekarreporter1: -: WOMAN ’ S MARATHON IN LAW :- By Daniel Mary, Advocate Women today face multitude of cultural, socio economic challenges
- [07/03, 22:04] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxG4bzV47kiT0KZ6ut0NCHmaKR5-aXXPFH?si=uLsUnVWHiusMebHm [07/03, 22:04] sekarreporter1: madurai saravanakumar advocate: Justice V Bharathidasan elderson marriage invitation [07/03, 21:21] saravanakumar advocate: Swamimalai Murugan Temple kumbakonam tomorrow morning [07/03, 21:22] sekarreporter1: 👍
- Trade mark order HON’BLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU OSA(CAD) No. 1 of 2025 & C.M.P.No. 7 of 2025 M/s.J.R.K’s Research and Pharmaceuticals Pvt.Ltd
- 43.In fine, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the judgment dated 11.10.2022 in O.S.No.23 of 2022 passed by the Tamil Nadu Waqf Tribunal at Chennai, is set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. Connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 27.02.2026
- The learned Additional Government Pleader (HR&CE) appearing for the respondents 8 to 10 is directed to find out whether any illegal encroachment persists in the temple property and if any illegal encroachment is made, the said encroachment shall be evicted and a report to that effect shall be filed by the respondents 8 to 10 before this Court on 12.03.2026. Post on 12.03.2026.