Follow:
- Next story Justice Anand Venkatesh, however, dismissed the plea as premature and on mere apprehensions. The Judge observed that converting a residence into a memorial was not something new and that it had happened in cases of various leaders who had earned the love and respect of the people. The Tamil Nadu government on Wednesday informed the the Madras High Court that it is also actively considering converting “Veda Nilayam”, the residence of late AIADMK supremo J Jayalalithaa at upscale Poes Garden, into the official residence of the Chief Minister. Advocate General Vijay Narayan submitted before Justice Anand Venkatesh that the government would be acquiring not only the immovable property but also the movables to make as it was during the times of the late chief minister. The submission was made during the hearing of a plea of a residents association against converting Jayalalithaa’s residence into a memorial.
- Previous story methodology adopted by Tamil Nadu generation and distribution corporation (Tangedco) for calculating power consumption charges during the period of COVID-19 lockdown from March 25, when meter readings could not be noted down. Justices M.M. Sundresh and R. Hemalatha rejected the case filed by M.L. Ravi of Desiya Makkal Sakthi Katchi and held that the methodology was “reasonable and justified”. They agreed with Additional Advocate General P.H. Arvindh Pandian that “any other methodology, especially the one suggested by the petitioner, would not ensure equality.”
Recent Posts
- R Y George Williams requested the first bench CISF extent to entire high court as well as entire judiciary in Tamilnau and further argued that baricaurd between the city court and High court May be removed and it maye be covered to entire campus to avoid multiple bresking to enter the high court premises. CJ informed that direction issued to everywhere. and further RY George Williams argued that high court for got the security of the lower judiciary
- Today 5 law tips/ Vinothpandian: 2019 (4) SCC ( cri ) 469 : kamil vs state of Uttar pradesh : sentence or order passed by trial court in absence of charge or any error , omission or irregularity in the charge including any misjoinder cannot be held invalid by court of appeal confirmation or revision, unless the accused is prejudiced and failure of justice has been occasioned thereby (. Sec 464 CRPC )
- SPEECH OF THIRU P.WILSON MP ON EMPOWERMENT OF SC-ST- OBC AT JAWAHAR BHAWAN ON 24.4.2024.
- The Madras University Vice Chancellor Appointment matter filed by B. Jagannath- came up today for Hearing on 23.04.2024 before the Learned First Bench.
- Judge velmurugan order . (31)Accordingly, the Review Application is dismissed with an exemplarycost of Rs.2,00,000/- [Rupees Two Lakhs Only] payable to the 1st respondent / plaintiff within a period of two weeks from today. The application for appointment
More
Recent Posts
- R Y George Williams requested the first bench CISF extent to entire high court as well as entire judiciary in Tamilnau and further argued that baricaurd between the city court and High court May be removed and it maye be covered to entire campus to avoid multiple bresking to enter the high court premises. CJ informed that direction issued to everywhere. and further RY George Williams argued that high court for got the security of the lower judiciary
- Today 5 law tips/ Vinothpandian: 2019 (4) SCC ( cri ) 469 : kamil vs state of Uttar pradesh : sentence or order passed by trial court in absence of charge or any error , omission or irregularity in the charge including any misjoinder cannot be held invalid by court of appeal confirmation or revision, unless the accused is prejudiced and failure of justice has been occasioned thereby (. Sec 464 CRPC )
- SPEECH OF THIRU P.WILSON MP ON EMPOWERMENT OF SC-ST- OBC AT JAWAHAR BHAWAN ON 24.4.2024.
- The Madras University Vice Chancellor Appointment matter filed by B. Jagannath- came up today for Hearing on 23.04.2024 before the Learned First Bench.
- Judge velmurugan order . (31)Accordingly, the Review Application is dismissed with an exemplarycost of Rs.2,00,000/- [Rupees Two Lakhs Only] payable to the 1st respondent / plaintiff within a period of two weeks from today. The application for appointment