You may also like...
-
In so far as the petitioners in W.P.(MD) No. 1752 of 2026, W.P.(MD) No.2331 of 2026 and W.P.(MD) No.2313 of 2026 are concerned, their cases are squarely covered by the bar under Rule 21(h)(3) of the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982. In the other case, the petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.1981 of 2026 convicted for offence under Section 396 of IPC and there is a bar under Rule 21(b) of the Rules. Consequently, no mandamus can be issued to grant ordinary leave to the convict prisoners in the teeth of the bar contained in the Rules. 66. In the result, the petitions fail and will accordingly stand dismissed. [N.A.V., J.] [K.K.R.K., J.]
by Sekar Reporter · Published April 29, 2026
-
-
[14/03, 07:47] sekarreporter1: “Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy issued the direction while disposing of a batch of writ petitions filed by 71 orthopaedicians, ophthalmologists, obstetricians and gynaecologists, dermatologists, otorhinolaryngologists, and other specialists against their deployment to primary healthcare centres (PHCs).” https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/deploying-specialist-doctors-in-phcs-not-illegal-rules-madras-high-court/article70735243.ece#:~:text=Justice%20D.%20Bharatha%20Chakravarthy%20issued,to%20primary%20healthcare%20centres%20(PHCs). [14/03, 07:47] sekarreporter1: 👍
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 14, 2026