Madras HC quashed ED’s PMLA case against RR Granites: complaint didn’t show any “proceeds of crime” linked to alleged illegal mining (2001-12). The land cited was bought in 2000; ED failed to prove the

by Sekar Reporter · March 10, 2026

Madras HC quashed ED’s PMLA case against RR Granites: complaint didn’t show any “proceeds of crime” linked to alleged illegal mining (2001-12). The land cited was bought in 2000; ED failed to prove the

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email

You may also like...

• 

  P.N. Prakash, J. Crl.R.C. Nos. 819 to 822 of 2013. D/d. 24.01.2020.Dishonour of Cheque – Complainant is not required to prove the debt – However, the complainant is required to plead about the existence of the debt in the complaint. Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 – Dishonour of Cheque – Presumption under sections 118 and 139 – Complainant is not required to prove the debtHeard Mr. R. Sankarappan, learned counsel for the accused and Mr. M. Arvind Kumar, learned counsel for the complainant.

  May 9, 2020

   by Sekar Reporter · Published May 9, 2020

• 

  FAREWELL ADDRESS OF THIRU.P.S.RAMAN, ADVOCATE GENERAL OF TAMILNADU TO THE HON’BLE JUSTICE THIRU.R.SUBRAMANIAN ON 24th JULY 2025

  July 25, 2025

   by Sekar Reporter · Published July 25, 2025

• 

  In the result, the Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the order of detention passed in P.D.No.49 of 2025, dated 05.10.2025, by the second respondent is set aside. The detenu, viz., Rajeshkumar, S/o. Manivasakam, aged about 37 years, is directed to be released forthwith unless his detention is required in connection with any other case.                                                                         (N.A.V.,J..)      (P.D.B.,J.,)

  March 18, 2026

   by Sekar Reporter · Published March 18, 2026