Follow:
- Next story Rajiv Gandhi assassination: SC wants to know T.N.’s position on convict’s mercy plea:
- Previous story Hon’ble Full Bench, consisting of Their Lordships, Hon’ble The Chief Justice, Hon’ble Mr. Justice C.V. Karthikeyan and Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.D. Audikesavalu. On behalf of the respondents, District Collector and the Government, the State Government Pleader Thiru V. Jayaprakashnarayanan appeared. The State Government Pleader submitted that as per Rule 8 of Tamil Nadu Liquor Vending Rules, no liquor shop will be permitted within the distance of 100 meters from the Religious Places and Educational Institutions. The said Rule is strictly followed by the authorities while locating the TASMAC shop for retail vending. Apart from that the TASMAC also issued circular in the year, wherein a direction was issued to the authorities, if there is any objections received, either from the Villagers or Grama Saba the same should be taken into consideration and the District Collectors were directed to drop such proposal. Further, the officers should avoid selecting places for location of shops in thickly populated areas. 41 such proposals were dropped; further the Government also already closed more than 3000 liquor shops. Therefore, the liquor vending rules and circulars will be taken care of the objections raised by the Village Panchayat and public at large before locating the liquor shops by TASMAC.
Recent Posts
- டாஸ்மாக் நிர்வாக இயக்குநர் விசாகன் இல்லத்தில் அமலாக்கத் துறை சோதனை நடத்தியது
- MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN P.(MD).No.4619 of 2025and W.M.P.(MD).No.3310 of 2025 A.R.Dairy Food Private Limited, Represented by its Authorized Signatory, R.Rajadharshini .. Petitioner Vs. 1.Food Safety and Standards Authority of India,
- In her reply speech, Justice Trivedi expressed gratitude and said that she is satisfied that she always acted as per her inner conscience.
- Supreme Court Collegium Recommends Karnataka High Court Judge As Next Chief Justice Of Manipur High Court
- Justices P Velmurugan and KK Ramakrishnan passed the directions on a PIL petition moved by P Ramesh (52) of Nerur in Manmangalam taluk of Karur. Ramesh in his plea stated that the Aravayee
More
Recent Posts
- டாஸ்மாக் நிர்வாக இயக்குநர் விசாகன் இல்லத்தில் அமலாக்கத் துறை சோதனை நடத்தியது
- MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN P.(MD).No.4619 of 2025and W.M.P.(MD).No.3310 of 2025 A.R.Dairy Food Private Limited, Represented by its Authorized Signatory, R.Rajadharshini .. Petitioner Vs. 1.Food Safety and Standards Authority of India,
- In her reply speech, Justice Trivedi expressed gratitude and said that she is satisfied that she always acted as per her inner conscience.
- Supreme Court Collegium Recommends Karnataka High Court Judge As Next Chief Justice Of Manipur High Court
- Justices P Velmurugan and KK Ramakrishnan passed the directions on a PIL petition moved by P Ramesh (52) of Nerur in Manmangalam taluk of Karur. Ramesh in his plea stated that the Aravayee
