Follow:
- Next story Rajiv Gandhi assassination: SC wants to know T.N.’s position on convict’s mercy plea:
- Previous story Hon’ble Full Bench, consisting of Their Lordships, Hon’ble The Chief Justice, Hon’ble Mr. Justice C.V. Karthikeyan and Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.D. Audikesavalu. On behalf of the respondents, District Collector and the Government, the State Government Pleader Thiru V. Jayaprakashnarayanan appeared. The State Government Pleader submitted that as per Rule 8 of Tamil Nadu Liquor Vending Rules, no liquor shop will be permitted within the distance of 100 meters from the Religious Places and Educational Institutions. The said Rule is strictly followed by the authorities while locating the TASMAC shop for retail vending. Apart from that the TASMAC also issued circular in the year, wherein a direction was issued to the authorities, if there is any objections received, either from the Villagers or Grama Saba the same should be taken into consideration and the District Collectors were directed to drop such proposal. Further, the officers should avoid selecting places for location of shops in thickly populated areas. 41 such proposals were dropped; further the Government also already closed more than 3000 liquor shops. Therefore, the liquor vending rules and circulars will be taken care of the objections raised by the Village Panchayat and public at large before locating the liquor shops by TASMAC.
Recent Posts
- Case #193: _S. Kumaradevan v. State_ | Madras HC* *Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy* *CRL OP No. 29214 of 2018 + http://Crl.M.P.No. 17111 of 2018* *Subject: Criminal Law + Quash Petition + FIR Quashing + Sec 482 CrPC*
- [23/07, 08:29] sekarreporter1: [23/07, 08:29] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2080125530113007868 [23/07, 08:29] sekarreporter1: வாக்கு எண்ணிக்கை நடத்திக் கொடுத்தவர்களுக்கு பார் கவுன்சிலிங் நேற்று பாராட்டு விழா நடந்தது [23/07, 08:29] sekarreporter1: 👍🌹🌹🌹
- No useful purpose will be served by conducting a trial against the petitioner and further continuation of the investigation as against this petitioner and making the petitioner to face the case would also turn out oppressive
- No. 515 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on : 23-03-2026 :::: Pronounced on : 05-06-2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU AS No. 515 of 2016 and CMP Nos. 17009, 12188 & 18867 of 2016 G.Vijaya A.Maharani Vs ..Appellant(s) ..Respondent(s) Prayer : This Appeal Suit filed to set aside the judgment and decree dated 29.04.2016 made in O.S. No. 2 of 2014 on the file of III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Cuddalore at Vridhachalam. For Appellant(s): For Respondent(s): Mr.K.R.Gunashekar Ms.V.Srimathi J U D G M E N T The present Appeal suit has been filed seeking to set aside
- http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx63aFObGRC67Nn44KSaIDtTld3rpEwz8g?si=12DuBF448yqPMtTa [23/07, 07:34] sekarreporter1: The Supreme Court has clarified that a computer-related offence punishable under Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 is a bailable offence.
More
Recent Posts
- Case #193: _S. Kumaradevan v. State_ | Madras HC* *Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy* *CRL OP No. 29214 of 2018 + http://Crl.M.P.No. 17111 of 2018* *Subject: Criminal Law + Quash Petition + FIR Quashing + Sec 482 CrPC*
- [23/07, 08:29] sekarreporter1: [23/07, 08:29] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2080125530113007868 [23/07, 08:29] sekarreporter1: வாக்கு எண்ணிக்கை நடத்திக் கொடுத்தவர்களுக்கு பார் கவுன்சிலிங் நேற்று பாராட்டு விழா நடந்தது [23/07, 08:29] sekarreporter1: 👍🌹🌹🌹
- No useful purpose will be served by conducting a trial against the petitioner and further continuation of the investigation as against this petitioner and making the petitioner to face the case would also turn out oppressive
- No. 515 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on : 23-03-2026 :::: Pronounced on : 05-06-2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU AS No. 515 of 2016 and CMP Nos. 17009, 12188 & 18867 of 2016 G.Vijaya A.Maharani Vs ..Appellant(s) ..Respondent(s) Prayer : This Appeal Suit filed to set aside the judgment and decree dated 29.04.2016 made in O.S. No. 2 of 2014 on the file of III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Cuddalore at Vridhachalam. For Appellant(s): For Respondent(s): Mr.K.R.Gunashekar Ms.V.Srimathi J U D G M E N T The present Appeal suit has been filed seeking to set aside
- http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx63aFObGRC67Nn44KSaIDtTld3rpEwz8g?si=12DuBF448yqPMtTa [23/07, 07:34] sekarreporter1: The Supreme Court has clarified that a computer-related offence punishable under Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 is a bailable offence.