Follow:
- Next story Harihara Arun Somasankar argued In O.A. No. 1090 to 1092 in C.S.No 687/2019 that there can be no rights claimed by ‘M/s Symphony Recording’ under Copyrights Act based on the agreement executed by a minor. Also section 19 of Copyrights Act restricts the rights under copyrights over and above 5 years If it’s executed for an unlimited period.
- Previous story [3/11, 10:57] Sekarreporter 1: Madras HC says Puducherry L-G & Council of Ministers should work in unison and not in division @THChennai [3/11, 10:57] Sekarreporter 1: Sets aside single judge’s order which held hat L-G cannot interfere with day to day functioning of the Union territory.
Recent Posts
- CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL.O.P.No.17359 of 2026 1. Sureshkumar 2. Narayanan ..Petitioners Vs. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Civil Supplies CID, Chennai. Crime No.149 of 2025 ..Respondent
- 15.With the above observations, the impugned order dated 20.09.2023 passed in W.P.No.4228 of 2020 is set aside and the writ appeal stands allowed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. [S.M.S., J.] [N.S., J.]
- The Second Appeals stand Partly Allowed. The defendants 2 and 3 are entitled to 1/12 share each in the suit property. The plaintiff and the 4th defendant are/HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR S.A.Nos.601, 612 and 614 of 2023 and C.M.P.Nos.19260, 19344 and 19365 of 2023 Lakshmana Gounder (Since Deceased) 1.Sengottaiyan 2.Krishnan 3.Mani … Appellants
- http://youtube.com/post/UgkxNd-kPNaPuZeUpk3uJnY2icCzwBDluPN3?si=wfT5eBnznWbRgir_ [20/07, 13:07] sekarreporter1: Partition Suit Pending Till Final Decree Can Account For Birth & Death Of Sharers: Madras High Court The Madras High Court partly allowed second appeals in a partition dispute after holding that the death of a sharer pending the first appeal had to be accounted for before final partition by metes and bounds.
- Judge Anand Venkadesh order to prepare seniority list
More
Recent Posts
- CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL.O.P.No.17359 of 2026 1. Sureshkumar 2. Narayanan ..Petitioners Vs. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Civil Supplies CID, Chennai. Crime No.149 of 2025 ..Respondent
- 15.With the above observations, the impugned order dated 20.09.2023 passed in W.P.No.4228 of 2020 is set aside and the writ appeal stands allowed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. [S.M.S., J.] [N.S., J.]
- The Second Appeals stand Partly Allowed. The defendants 2 and 3 are entitled to 1/12 share each in the suit property. The plaintiff and the 4th defendant are/HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR S.A.Nos.601, 612 and 614 of 2023 and C.M.P.Nos.19260, 19344 and 19365 of 2023 Lakshmana Gounder (Since Deceased) 1.Sengottaiyan 2.Krishnan 3.Mani … Appellants
- http://youtube.com/post/UgkxNd-kPNaPuZeUpk3uJnY2icCzwBDluPN3?si=wfT5eBnznWbRgir_ [20/07, 13:07] sekarreporter1: Partition Suit Pending Till Final Decree Can Account For Birth & Death Of Sharers: Madras High Court The Madras High Court partly allowed second appeals in a partition dispute after holding that the death of a sharer pending the first appeal had to be accounted for before final partition by metes and bounds.
- Judge Anand Venkadesh order to prepare seniority list