You may also like...
-
The Result: In the result, these contempt appeals are partly allowed and are disposed of on the following terms: The unconditional apology tendered by the appellants is accepted; The sentence of imprisonment and fine imposed vide order dated 02.08.2023 in CONT.P(MD)No.374 of 2020 is set aside; The undertaking of payment of interest at the rate of 6% p.a., on Rs.1,38,486/- from 05.08.2019 till 28.07.2023 forthwith on receipt of the copy of this order is recorded; No costs; Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (S.S.S.R.,J.) (D.B.C.,J) 25.09.2023 sji NCC : Yes / No Index:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Note : It can be seen in this case, when no ground existed for review, an opinion was rendered to file a review and ultimately it was not filed. When an observation was made that the Order passed was prima facie contemptuous, a contempt appeal is filed, when there is no punishment so as to maintain an appeal under section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act and when there is no ‘judgment’ determining the rights of parties even to maintain an appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent. Hence, a copy of this order shall be marked to the Learned Advocate General for his consideration. S.S.SUNDAR, J. AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY,J. sji To 1.Pradeeph Yadav, I.A.S., The Secretary, to the State of Tamil Nadu, Department of School Education, Fort. St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.Muthupalanichamy, The Director of Teacher Education Research and Training Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai-600 009. 3.Boobala Anto, The Principal, District Institute of Education and Training Munanjipatti, Tirunelveli District. CONT.A(MD)Nos.8 and 9 of 2023 25.09.2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 10, 2023
-
Tks lot km basha former HC judge
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 14, 2020
-