You may also like...
-
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM C.M.A.No.2688 of 2018–For Appellant : Mr.M.S.Krishnan Senior Counsel For M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates For Respondents : R1 – Mr.S.Rajasekar R2 & R3 – M/s.Karthikaa Ashok Senior Standing counsel [For Chennai Corporation] J U D G M E N T The Fair and Decreetal order dated 10.04.2017 passed in I.A.No.1057 of 2016 is under challenge in the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal —Under these circumstances, this Court has no hesitation in arriving a conclusion that the interim injunction granted by the trial Court only in respect of the public road is perverse and consequently, the Fair and Decreetal order dated 10.04.2017 passed in I.A.No.1057 of 2016 in O.S.No.169 of 2016 stands set aside and consequently, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal in C.M.A.No.2688 of 2018 is allowed. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 9, 2021
-
Temple case HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 48951 of 2025 M.Thamizharasan,
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 22, 2025
-
was a Friday afternoon. 5th court of the Madras High Court, in session. A Second Appeal was being heard. The appellant was represented by a junior advocate who was but a few months in practice. The appeal arose from a suit for Partition author. Narasimman vijayatagavan
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 18, 2020
