Lordship s Vaithiyanathan j peculiar order in divorce case direction to registry by Sekar Reporter · December 21, 2019 [12/21, 09:28] Sekarreporter 1: C.M.P.No.26266 of 2019 in C.M.S.A.SR.No.107052 of 2019 1/10 C.M.P.No.26266 of 2019 in C.M.S.A.SR.No.107052 of 2019 Reserved on Pronounced on 09.12.2019 20.12.2019 Petitioner Respondent PU.VENKATESAN NO.7/227, (NEAR VELAMMAL SCHOOL) MOGAPPAIR WEST, CHENNAI 37. P.G.EGAVALLI NO.3/96, SEVINDIAMMAN KOIL ST, VANGANOOR PO, PALLIPAT TK, TIRUVALLUR DT. SMT. DEEPTHI ARIVUNIDHI I ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE, TIRUVALLUR COIMBINED COURT. Petitioner Counsel Respondent Counsel PU.VENKATESAN P Subject NOT available District TIRUVALLUR Presentation Date 01/10/2019 Prayer To accept the cause title for adding Judge Smt Deepthi Arivunidhi as Respondent 2 in the above Case and thus render justice. S.VAIDYANATHAN,J. The Petitioner / Party-in-Person has come forward with the present petition, seeking to accept the cause title for adding the I Additional District Judge, Tiruvallur, namely, Smt.Deepthi Arivunidhi as Respondent No.2 in the Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal, which is in SR stage. For the sake of brevity, the parties would be referred to as per their nomenclature in the present petition as “Petitioner” and “Respondent No.1 / Wife, namely, P.G.Egavalli”. [12/21, 09:31] Sekarreporter 1: C.M.P.No.26266 of 2019 in C.M.S.A.SR.No.107052 of 2019 8/10 the execution of any warrant or order, which he would be bound to execute, if within the jurisdiction of the person issuing the same.” In addition to the above, there is one more act, called The Judges (Protection) Act, 1985, to secure additional protection for Judges and others acting judicially and relevant section of the Act is extracted hereunder: “3. Additional protection to Judges.—(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force and subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), no court shall entertain or continue any civil or criminal proceeding against any person who is or was a Judge for any act, thing or word committed, done or spoken by him when, or in the course of, acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official or judicial duty or function.” It is pertinent to state here that if a decision rendered by the Lower Forum is found to be wrong, in the appeal, the Appellate Court can rectify the same and rewrite the judgment. Likewise, if a decision is rendered based on any extraneous consideration, then the Higher Forum will suo motu take action against the Subordinate Judicial Officers. But, the averments made in the present case on hand are not germane and it is not known as to why Registry had not listed the matter for maintainability before numbering the present Civil Miscellaneous Petition. Considering the totality of the circumstances, I find that there is no [12/21, 09:32] Sekarreporter 1: C.M.P.No.26266 of 2019 in C.M.S.A.SR.No.107052 of 2019 9/10 ground made out to accept the case of the Petitioner so as to amend the cause title by adding the name of the I Additional District Judge, Tiruvallur therein. Accordingly, the present Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. It is open to the Registry to scrutinize the papers and number the Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal, provided the same is in order. It is further directed that before numbering the CMSA, Registry must ensure that the name of the I Additional District Judge, Tiruvallur does not find place anywhere in the petition, typeset, etc., including the cause title and if it is found, the same needs to be struck off / deleted by the Registry, by duly endorsing the order passed in this petition today. 20.12.2019
An association of rental vehicle owners has moved the Madras High Court seeking a host of relief, including financial assistance of ₹15,000 each, waiver of State road tax for the lockdown period and extension of vehicle insurance by six months. The Tamil Nadu Independent Rental Vehicle June 26, 2020 by Sekar Reporter · Published June 26, 2020
sekarreporter1: Counsel for Petitioner Mrs. Roopeshwari Mahaveer Sai வழக்கை விரைந்து முடிக்க மனுதாரருக்கு உரிமை உண்டு வழக்கை நீடிக்க தேவையற்ற உள்நோக்கத்துடன் மனு தாக்கல் செய்தால் அனைத்து நீதிமன்றங்களும் அதிகபட்ச அபராதம் விதித்து மனுவை தள்ளுபடி செய்யப்பட வேண்டும் வேண்டுமென சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. December 30, 2022 by Sekar Reporter · Published December 30, 2022
302 Life sentence THE COURT OF SESSIONS JUDGE, MAHALIR NEETHIMANDRAM CHENNAI – 600 003. Present : Thiru.T.H.Mohammed Farooq, M.A., M.L., Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram, Chennai Dated, Monday, the 16th day of May, 2022 2053 – jpUts;Sth; Mz;L. RgfpUJ itfhrp jp’;fs; 2Mk; ehs; jp’;fl;fpHik JUDGMENT IN SESSIONS CASE No. 221/2017 May 17, 2022 by Sekar Reporter · Published May 17, 2022