Follow:
- Next story [5/25, 06:21] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: Virtual Courts Cannot Fully Replace Open Court Hearings; Technology Can Make Justice System More Efficient & Accessible : Justice Chandrachud https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/virtual-courts-cannot-fully-replace-open-court-hearings-technology-can-make-justice-system-more-efficient-accessible-justice-chandrachud-157260#.XssWmk2cOTc.whatsapp [5/25, 07:26] Sekarreporter 1: 🍁🍁
- Previous story Mhc advt Chopra: After the successful Series 1, We are back with Series 2
Recent Posts
- Pmla case anitha radakrishnan
- Justice Pugalendhi noted that both the high court and the Supreme Court, in similar petitions, have recognised the labour inspector’s right to confer permanent status on eligible employees.
- The Supreme Court on Friday modified its March 11 order that had directed the Centre, states and others to disassociate from three academics, following a row over an NCERT book chapter containing “offending” contents on corruption in the judiciary.
- Ipr case Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, by an order dated April 29, 2026, said the organiser would not be permitted to proceed with the events unless it either paid the amount claimed by IPRS or created a fixed deposit in favour of the registrar general of the high court.
- Order setaside OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.04.2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.(MD)No.11144 of 2026 G.Dhandayuthapandi .. Petitioner Vs. – The Sub Registrar, Joint-3 Sub Registrar Office, Srirangam Taluk, Trichy
More
Recent Posts
- Pmla case anitha radakrishnan
- Justice Pugalendhi noted that both the high court and the Supreme Court, in similar petitions, have recognised the labour inspector’s right to confer permanent status on eligible employees.
- The Supreme Court on Friday modified its March 11 order that had directed the Centre, states and others to disassociate from three academics, following a row over an NCERT book chapter containing “offending” contents on corruption in the judiciary.
- Ipr case Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, by an order dated April 29, 2026, said the organiser would not be permitted to proceed with the events unless it either paid the amount claimed by IPRS or created a fixed deposit in favour of the registrar general of the high court.
- Order setaside OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.04.2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.(MD)No.11144 of 2026 G.Dhandayuthapandi .. Petitioner Vs. – The Sub Registrar, Joint-3 Sub Registrar Office, Srirangam Taluk, Trichy