Lordship baradidasan

by Sekar Reporter · January 19, 2020

https://youtu.be/AFudy0637LQ

You may also like...

• 

  Therefore, this Court is of the concrete opinion that the service conditions of the petitioners are not violated nor infringed.  When two posts carry equivalent scale of pay and treated as equal categories under the Rules, admittedly, the petitioners have no right to claim a particular post as a matter of right or choice.  Status cannot be claimed in the Government service.  When the service conditions are not infringed from and out of the administrative transfers effected, the Government employees have no right to claim the post as their choice.  Thus, the petitioners have not established any right for the purpose of challenging the impugned orders nor they have established violation of the service conditions contemplated under the Rules.  Therefore, the circular issued by the Joint Director of School Education and the consequential transfer orders issued by the Chief Educational Officers do not affect the service conditions of the petitioners and they have not established any right for the purpose of entertaining the writ petitions and for grant of the relief sought for. Accordingly, all the writ petitions are dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.   04.03.2022  Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No krk To: 1.The Principal Secretary to Government,    School Education Department,    State of Tamil Nadu,    Fort, St.George, Secretariat,    Chennai-600 009. 2.The Commissioner of School Education,    O/o.Commissioner of School Education,    Nungambakkam, Chennai. 3.The Joint Director of School Education (Personnel),    O/o.the Joint Director of School Education,    Chennai-600 006. 4.The Chief Educational Officer,    Dindigul District, Dindigul. 5.The Chief Educational Officer,    Theni District, Theni. 6.The Chief Educational Officer,   

  October 25, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published October 25, 2022

• 

  Madras bar association p n prakash judge excellant speech regarding criminal how o come social media controle every one

  January 10, 2023

   by Sekar Reporter · Published January 10, 2023

• 

  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.Nos.663 to 665 of 2018 and W.M.P.Nos.830 to 835 of 2018 Mr.Sridhar Anand–In the present cases, the petitioner could not able to establish that he approached the Settlement Commission with clean hands and the element of true and full disclosure as contemplated under Section 245(C) had not been established before the Settlement Commission and therefore, there is no perversity or infirmity as such in respect of the findings arrived.full order

  April 24, 2021

   by Sekar Reporter · Published April 24, 2021