Law tips vinoth pandian
[2/21, 09:40] Vinothpandian: 2012 (9) SCC 552 : Bharat aluminium co vs kaiser aluminium technical service : Held section 36 of the arbitration and coincilation act necessarily refers to enforcement of domestic awards only
[2/21, 14:04] Vinothpandian: 2012 (5) SCC 488 : super cassettes industries ltd vs music broadcast pvt ltd : Held in matters under order 39 rules 1 & 2 and sec 151 CPC 1908 , an interim relief granting final relief should be given after exercise of great caution and in rare and exceptional cases
[2/21, 14:04] Vinothpandian: 2015 (11) SCC 782 : Lisamma Antony & another vs karthiyayani & another ; Held second appeal under sec 100 of CPC cannot be admitted unless there is substantial question of law involved in it
[2/23, 11:04] Vinothpandian: 2014 (4) SCC 186 : SVA steel.Re- rolling mills ltd & others vs state of kerala : Held provisions of section 22 – B electricity act 1910 are not applicable where state had given an assurance with regard to uninterrupted supply of electricity to consumers
[2/23, 11:04] Vinothpandian: 2014 (11) SCC 639 : world sport group ( mauritius ) ltd vs MSM satellite ( singapore ) pvt ltd : Held meaning of principle of comity is that courts of one state or jurisdiction will give effect to law and judicial decisions of another state or jurisdiction , not as a matter of obligation but out of deference and mutual respect
[2/23, 11:04] Vinothpandian: 2011 (4) SCC 240 : H siddiqui ( dead ) by LRS vs A Ramalingam : Held , it is a duty of court to decide question of admissibility of a document in secondary evidence before making endorsement thereon ( section 65 evidence act )
[2/23, 12:43] Vinothpandian: AIR 2011 SC 2057 : vimleshwar nagappa shet vs noor ahmad sheriff & others ; A concession made by a counsel on a question of fact held is binding on the client , but if it is on a questional of law it is not binding ( order 3 rule 1 & 2 CPC 1908 )
[2/24, 10:47] Vinothpandian: AIR 2014 SC 1155 : Rajinder kumar vs kuldeep singh : once decree for specific performance attained finality , held weak and lame contentions regarding executability of decree cannot be permitted to be raised , ( sec 20 specific relief act 1963 )
[2/24, 10:52] Vinothpandian: 2015 (11) SCC 782 : Lisamma antony & another vs karthiyayani & another : Held second appeal under sec 100 of CPC cannot be admitted unless there is substantial question of law involved in it
[2/24, 11:07] Vinothpandian: 2015 (12) SCC 46 : Rohini traders vs JK lakshmi cement ltd : Held object of order X11 rule 8 of the code is to facilitate the plaintiff or any other party to get a document on record which is not in their possession or in possession of the other party
[2/25, 11:01] Vinothpandian: 2017 (3) SCC 797 : Harjas Rai makhija vs pushparani jain : Held a decree obtained by playing fraud on the court is a nullity , such a decree could be challenged at any time in any proceedings ( order 21 rule 90 CPC 1908 )
[2/21, 09:40] Vinothpandian: 2012 (9) SCC 552 : Bharat aluminium co vs kaiser aluminium technical service : Held section 36 of the arbitration and coincilation act necessarily refers to enforcement of domestic awards only
[2/21, 14:04] Vinothpandian: 2012 (5) SCC 488 : super cassettes industries ltd vs music broadcast pvt ltd : Held in matters under order 39 rules 1 & 2 and sec 151 CPC 1908 , an interim relief granting final relief should be given after exercise of great caution and in rare and exceptional cases
[2/21, 14:04] Vinothpandian: 2015 (11) SCC 782 : Lisamma Antony & another vs karthiyayani & another ; Held second appeal under sec 100 of CPC cannot be admitted unless there is substantial question of law involved in it
[2/23, 11:04] Vinothpandian: 2014 (4) SCC 186 : SVA steel.Re- rolling mills ltd & others vs state of kerala : Held provisions of section 22 – B electricity act 1910 are not applicable where state had given an assurance with regard to uninterrupted supply of electricity to consumers
[2/23, 11:04] Vinothpandian: 2014 (11) SCC 639 : world sport group ( mauritius ) ltd vs MSM satellite ( singapore ) pvt ltd : Held meaning of principle of comity is that courts of one state or jurisdiction will give effect to law and judicial decisions of another state or jurisdiction , not as a matter of obligation but out of deference and mutual respect
[2/23, 11:04] Vinothpandian: 2011 (4) SCC 240 : H siddiqui ( dead ) by LRS vs A Ramalingam : Held , it is a duty of court to decide question of admissibility of a document in secondary evidence before making endorsement thereon ( section 65 evidence act )
[2/23, 12:43] Vinothpandian: AIR 2011 SC 2057 : vimleshwar nagappa shet vs noor ahmad sheriff & others ; A concession made by a counsel on a question of fact held is binding on the client , but if it is on a questional of law it is not binding ( order 3 rule 1 & 2 CPC 1908 )
[2/24, 10:47] Vinothpandian: AIR 2014 SC 1155 : Rajinder kumar vs kuldeep singh : once decree for specific performance attained finality , held weak and lame contentions regarding executability of decree cannot be permitted to be raised , ( sec 20 specific relief act 1963 )
[2/24, 10:52] Vinothpandian: 2015 (11) SCC 782 : Lisamma antony & another vs karthiyayani & another : Held second appeal under sec 100 of CPC cannot be admitted unless there is substantial question of law involved in it
[2/24, 11:07] Vinothpandian: 2015 (12) SCC 46 : Rohini traders vs JK lakshmi cement ltd : Held object of order X11 rule 8 of the code is to facilitate the plaintiff or any other party to get a document on record which is not in their possession or in possession of the other party
[2/25, 11:01] Vinothpandian: 2017 (3) SCC 797 : Harjas Rai makhija vs pushparani jain : Held a decree obtained by playing fraud on the court is a nullity , such a decree could be challenged at any time in any proceedings ( order 21 rule 90 CPC 1908 )
[2/21, 09:40] Vinothpandian: 2012 (9) SCC 552 : Bharat aluminium co vs kaiser aluminium technical service : Held section 36 of the arbitration and coincilation act necessarily refers to enforcement of domestic awards only
[2/21, 14:04] Vinothpandian: 2012 (5) SCC 488 : super cassettes industries ltd vs music broadcast pvt ltd : Held in matters under order 39 rules 1 & 2 and sec 151 CPC 1908 , an interim relief granting final relief should be given after exercise of great caution and in rare and exceptional cases
[2/21, 14:04] Vinothpandian: 2015 (11) SCC 782 : Lisamma Antony & another vs karthiyayani & another ; Held second appeal under sec 100 of CPC cannot be admitted unless there is substantial question of law involved in it
[2/23, 11:04] Vinothpandian: 2014 (4) SCC 186 : SVA steel.Re- rolling mills ltd & others vs state of kerala : Held provisions of section 22 – B electricity act 1910 are not applicable where state had given an assurance with regard to uninterrupted supply of electricity to consumers
[2/23, 11:04] Vinothpandian: 2014 (11) SCC 639 : world sport group ( mauritius ) ltd vs MSM satellite ( singapore ) pvt ltd : Held meaning of principle of comity is that courts of one state or jurisdiction will give effect to law and judicial decisions of another state or jurisdiction , not as a matter of obligation but out of deference and mutual respect
[2/23, 11:04] Vinothpandian: 2011 (4) SCC 240 : H siddiqui ( dead ) by LRS vs A Ramalingam : Held , it is a duty of court to decide question of admissibility of a document in secondary evidence before making endorsement thereon ( section 65 evidence act )
[2/23, 12:43] Vinothpandian: AIR 2011 SC 2057 : vimleshwar nagappa shet vs noor ahmad sheriff & others ; A concession made by a counsel on a question of fact held is binding on the client , but if it is on a questional of law it is not binding ( order 3 rule 1 & 2 CPC 1908 )
[2/24, 10:47] Vinothpandian: AIR 2014 SC 1155 : Rajinder kumar vs kuldeep singh : once decree for specific performance attained finality , held weak and lame contentions regarding executability of decree cannot be permitted to be raised , ( sec 20 specific relief act 1963 )
[2/24, 10:52] Vinothpandian: 2015 (11) SCC 782 : Lisamma antony & another vs karthiyayani & another : Held second appeal under sec 100 of CPC cannot be admitted unless there is substantial question of law involved in it
[2/24, 11:07] Vinothpandian: 2015 (12) SCC 46 : Rohini traders vs JK lakshmi cement ltd : Held object of order X11 rule 8 of the code is to facilitate the plaintiff or any other party to get a document on record which is not in their possession or in possession of the other party
[2/25, 11:01] Vinothpandian: 2017 (3) SCC 797 : Harjas Rai makhija vs pushparani jain : Held a decree obtained by playing fraud on the court is a nullity , such a decree could be challenged at any time in any proceedings ( order 21 rule 90 CPC 1908 )
[2/21, 09:40] Vinothpandian: 2012 (9) SCC 552 : Bharat aluminium co vs kaiser aluminium technical service : Held section 36 of the arbitration and coincilation act necessarily refers to enforcement of domestic awards only
[2/21, 14:04] Vinothpandian: 2012 (5) SCC 488 : super cassettes industries ltd vs music broadcast pvt ltd : Held in matters under order 39 rules 1 & 2 and sec 151 CPC 1908 , an interim relief granting final relief should be given after exercise of great caution and in rare and exceptional cases
[2/21, 14:04] Vinothpandian: 2015 (11) SCC 782 : Lisamma Antony & another vs karthiyayani & another ; Held second appeal under sec 100 of CPC cannot be admitted unless there is substantial question of law involved in it
[2/23, 11:04] Vinothpandian: 2014 (4) SCC 186 : SVA steel.Re- rolling mills ltd & others vs state of kerala : Held provisions of section 22 – B electricity act 1910 are not applicable where state had given an assurance with regard to uninterrupted supply of electricity to consumers
[2/23, 11:04] Vinothpandian: 2014 (11) SCC 639 : world sport group ( mauritius ) ltd vs MSM satellite ( singapore ) pvt ltd : Held meaning of principle of comity is that courts of one state or jurisdiction will give effect to law and judicial decisions of another state or jurisdiction , not as a matter of obligation but out of deference and mutual respect
[2/23, 11:04] Vinothpandian: 2011 (4) SCC 240 : H siddiqui ( dead ) by LRS vs A Ramalingam : Held , it is a duty of court to decide question of admissibility of a document in secondary evidence before making endorsement thereon ( section 65 evidence act )
[2/23, 12:43] Vinothpandian: AIR 2011 SC 2057 : vimleshwar nagappa shet vs noor ahmad sheriff & others ; A concession made by a counsel on a question of fact held is binding on the client , but if it is on a questional of law it is not binding ( order 3 rule 1 & 2 CPC 1908 )
[2/24, 10:47] Vinothpandian: AIR 2014 SC 1155 : Rajinder kumar vs kuldeep singh : once decree for specific performance attained finality , held weak and lame contentions regarding executability of decree cannot be permitted to be raised , ( sec 20 specific relief act 1963 )
[2/24, 10:52] Vinothpandian: 2015 (11) SCC 782 : Lisamma antony & another vs karthiyayani & another : Held second appeal under sec 100 of CPC cannot be admitted unless there is substantial question of law involved in it
[2/24, 11:07] Vinothpandian: 2015 (12) SCC 46 : Rohini traders vs JK lakshmi cement ltd : Held object of order X11 rule 8 of the code is to facilitate the plaintiff or any other party to get a document on record which is not in their possession or in possession of the other party
[2/25, 11:01] Vinothpandian: 2017 (3) SCC 797 : Harjas Rai makhija vs pushparani jain : Held a decree obtained by playing fraud on the court is a nullity , such a decree could be challenged at any time in any proceedings ( order 21 rule 90 CPC 1908 )
