You may also like...
-
![Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) DRTC 841 ; k sami vs branch manager , bank of india : mere decision of financial institution to approach the magistrate under sec 14 of SARFASI act would also constitute a measure under sec 13(4) of the SARFASI act [12/6, 11:01] Vinothpandian: 2015 (1)](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) DRTC 841 ; k sami vs branch manager , bank of india : mere decision of financial institution to approach the magistrate under sec 14 of SARFASI act would also constitute a measure under sec 13(4) of the SARFASI act [12/6, 11:01] Vinothpandian: 2015 (1)
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 13, 2021
-
Smsj full order THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM C.M.S.A.No.27 of 2020 -++-The only question of law raised in the present second appeal is that whether the complaint/application filed by the respondent before the Regulatory Authority is maintainable or not. In view of the fact that the completion certificate issued by the Executive Officer, Town Panchayat is not in consonance either with the provisions of the Town and Country Planning Act as well as the building plan approval sanctioned by the Director of Town and Country Planning or in accordance with the provision of the RERA Act, the same cannot be construed as a valid certificate for the purpose of grant of exclusion under Section 3(2)(b) of the RERA Act. The certificate is to be construed as insignificant and irrelevant as far as the RERA Act is concerned and for all purposes, the building is to be treated as on-going project. Therefore, the appellants/builders are bound to comply with the terms and conditions in the project as well as comply with the provisions of various laws governing real estate affairs. Accordingly, this Court has no hesitation in arriving a conclusion that the application/complaint filed by the respondents/apartment owners association is maintainable under the provisions of the RERA Act, 2016 and accordingly, the order passed by the Appellate Tribunal stands confirmed and consequently, Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal stands dismissed. No costs. The Regulatory Authority is directed to entertain the application/complaint filed by the respondents/apartment owners association and adjudicate the issues on merits and in accordance with law by affording opportunity to all the parties concerned and accordingly, pass speaking final orders within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 25, 2021
-
[1/10, 15:20] Sekarreporter: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2020/01/10/%e0%ae%95%e0%ae%be%e0%ae%9f%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%9f%e0%af%81%e0%ae%ae%e0%ae%a9%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%a9%e0%ae%be%e0%ae%b0%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%95%e0%af%8b%e0%ae%af%e0%ae%bf%e0%ae%b2%e0%af%8d-%e0%ae%a4%e0%af%8a%e0%ae%95/ [1/10, 15:20] Sekarreporter: காட்டுமன்னார்கோயில் தொகுதியில் நிராகரிக்கப்பட்ட 102 தபால் வாக்குகளுடன் ஆஜராக மாவட்ட தேர்தல் அதிகாரிக்கு உத்தரவு * திருமாவளவன் தொடர்ந்த தேர்தல் வழக்கில் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு #HighCourt | #LocalBodyElection https://t.co/QQHDqnL0qN
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 10, 2020
