Justices P Velmurugan and M Jothiraman. During the hearing, Rayer tendered an unconditional apology and stated that he was ready to pay the fine amount. Recording the same, the Division Bench closed the appeal.”
[18/01, 07:38] Sekarreporter: “While hearing the matter, Justice CV Karthikeyan held that a contempt petition cannot be filed in such a manner against a judicial officer and that the case was not maintainable. Accordingly, the petition was dismissed.
The HC also noted that the petitioner had threatened the officials and staff of the Villupuram court and, therefore, in an order passed in 2023, imposed a fine of Rs 25,000 on him. The court directed that the amount be paid to the Villupuram District Legal Services Authority and warned that, in case of default, the Villupuram Collector should recover the amount from the petitioner under the Revenue Recovery Act.
Challenging this order, Rayer filed an appeal, which came up for hearing before Justices P Velmurugan and M Jothiraman. During the hearing, Rayer tendered an unconditional apology and stated that he was ready to pay the fine amount. Recording the same, the Division Bench closed the appeal.”
https://www.dtnext.in/news/tamilnadu/madras-hc-closes-appeal-after-apology-for-threatening-court-staff#:~:text=While%20hearing%20the,closed%20the%20appeal.
[18/01, 07:39] Meta AI: ஒருவர் விழுப்புரம் நீதிமன்ற ஊழியர்களை அச்சுறுத்தியதாக கூறி, அவருக்கு ₹25,000 அபராதம் விதிக்கப்பட்டது. அவர் மன்னிப்பு கோரியதை ஏற்று, மாநில உயர்நீதிமன்றம் அபராதத்தை செலுத்தும்படி கூறி வழக்கை முடித்து வைத்தது. அபராதம் செலுத்தாவிட்டால், வருவாய் மீட்டெடுப்பு சட்டத்தின் கீழ் நடவடிக்கை எடுக்கப்படும் என்றும் எச்சரிக்கப்பட்டது. 😊
[18/01, 07:39] Meta AI: A guy was fined ₹25,000 for threatening Villupuram court staff. He apologized, and the Madras High Court accepted it, directing him to pay the fine. If unpaid, the Villupuram Collector will recover it under the Revenue Recovery Act. Case closed 😊
[18/01, 07:39] Sekarreporter: [18/01, 07:38] Sekarreporter: “While hearing the matter, Justice CV Karthikeyan held that a contempt petition cannot be filed in such a manner against a judicial officer and that the case was not maintainable. Accordingly, the petition was dismissed.
The HC also noted that the petitioner had threatened the officials and staff of the Villupuram court and, therefore, in an order passed in 2023, imposed a fine of Rs 25,000 on him. The court directed that the amount be paid to the Villupuram District Legal Services Authority and warned that, in case of default, the Villupuram Collector should recover the amount from the petitioner under the Revenue Recovery Act.
Challenging this order, Rayer filed an appeal, which came up for hearing before Justices P Velmurugan and M Jothiraman. During the hearing, Rayer tendered an unconditional apology and stated that he was ready to pay the fine amount. Recording the same, the Division Bench closed the appeal.”
https://www.dtnext.in/news/tamilnadu/madras-hc-closes-appeal-after-apology-for-threatening-court-staff#:~:text=While%20hearing%20the,closed%20the%20appeal.
[18/01, 07:39] Sekarreporter: English
[18/01, 07:39] Meta AI: A man apologized for threatening Villupuram court staff and agreed to pay a ₹25,000 fine imposed by the Madras High Court. The court accepted his apology and closed the appeal. He’d previously been ordered to pay the fine to the Villupuram District Legal Services Authority or face recovery under the Revenue Recovery Act.
