Justice T.S.Sivagnanam and Justice V.Bhavani Subbaroyan held that it will not only be a case of filing inaccurate particulars, but also a case of concealment of income. The court further noted that the information came to the Department through the AIR, which was forwarded by the Registration Department and after verifying the same, when notice was issued under Section 143(2), the assessee, for the first time stated that due to inadvertence, they did not disclose the particulars relating to the capital gains.

Logo
HEADLINES
Delhi HC issues notice to Shivinder Singh on Religare Finvest plea challenging his Bail in Bank Fraud
MCA extends last date of filing Cost Audit Report [Read Notification]
Forfeiture of Security Deposit shall be treated as Capital Loss: ITAT grants relief to Ebony Retail [Read Order]
No GST Exemption on Leasing of Immovable Property in the Nature of Hotel, Inn, Guest House: Karnataka AAAR [Read Order]
ITC available on GST charged by Service Provider on Hiring of Bus / Motor Vehicle for Transportation of Employees to & from Workplace: AAR [Read Order]
GST: Patiala House Court denies Bail to accused for creating Fake Firms and claiming Fraudulent ITC [Read Order]
1% TDS applicable on Payments made to E-Commerce Participants from October 1, 2020 [Read Act]
Attempt to blame the Chartered Accountant cannot result in the assessee’s exoneration and claimed in absolute terms: Madras HC [Read Judgment]
Govt. to Levy 5% TCS on Foreign Remittances from October 1 [Read Act]
Gujarat High Court issues notice on Plea challenging Provision blocking ITC due to non-filing of GSTR-3B by vendor [Read Order]

HEADLINES | INCOME TAX | TOP STORIES
Attempt to blame the Chartered Accountant cannot result in the assessee’s exoneration and claimed in absolute terms: Madras HC [Read Judgment]

September 10, 2020 10:48 am| By : Mariya Paliwala
Madras High Court – Chartered Accountant – assessee – Taxscan

The Madras High Court while ruling against the assessee held that the attempt to blame the Chartered Accountant cannot result in the assessee’s exoneration and claimed in absolute terms.

The Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee, M/s. Gangotri Textiles Ltd. had sold two landed properties at Kalapatti and Dharapuram and the capital gain was worked out for both the properties at Rs.1,37,31,142.

However the assessee did not disclose about the sale of the lands and windmill in the return of income, which was clear from the perusal of the return of income and in the relevant column, it is stated as ‘Nil’.

The assessee relied upon the annual report and substantial portion of the report was read to us by the learned counsel to impress that the assessee’s non-disclosure was bonafide and an inadvertent mistake.

Firstly, the annual report is not a report, which is filed under the Income Tax Act. Furthermore, on facts, it is admitted that this annual report was never filed with the Income Tax Department. The Chartered Accountant has reported the captial gains as Nil and this has been signed by the Managing Director of the Company.

The division bench of Justice T.S.Sivagnanam and Justice V.Bhavani Subbaroyan held that it will not only be a case of filing inaccurate particulars, but also a case of concealment of income.

The court further noted that the information came to the Department through the AIR, which was forwarded by the Registration Department and after verifying the same, when notice was issued under Section 143(2), the assessee, for the first time stated that due to inadvertence, they did not disclose the particulars relating to the capital gains.

“The above facts will clearly show that the assessee did not act bonafidely and the belated explanation sought to be offered deserves to be rejected,” the court said.

Subscribe Taxscan AdFree to view the Judgment

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Call Now ButtonCALL ME
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com