Follow:
- Next story Playing cards with stakes is not an offence under the Tamil Nadu Gaming Act and whereas playing cards in any gaming house is only an offence under the Act. As already pointed out that the Clubs in which the accused persons were played cards are not gaming under the purview of common gaming house.
- Previous story The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed a petition challenging the validity of the Centre’s 26-year-old notification according minority status to five communities — Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists and Parsis, saying religion must be considered pan-India.the bench asked senior advocate Mohan Parasaran, appearing for Upadhyay, to show the judgments where it has been held that state-wise population can be considered for granting minority status. It asked as to how can there be guidelines to decide this and observed, “I don’t think we should entertain this”.
Recent Posts
- _குருமன்ஸ் சாதிசான்று வழங்கப்பட்டது.*_வழக்கறிஞர்கள் S.துரைசாமி V. இளங்கோவன்
- Adhilashmi Logomoorthy: Legal Eagles Elites presents 100 Hours Crash Course for APP – Preliminary Examination on Zoom
- Writ Petitions, WP 21340 and 21347/2021, challenging the Constitutional validity of Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants
- Madras HC dismissed a batch of 14 Writ Petitions filed by the various promoters challenging proceedings and attachment initiated under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act of 1988
- Full order THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P. No.13284, 13286, 13287, 13289, 13291 & Petitioner : Mr.P.B.Harish For Respondents : Mrs.R.Hemalatha Senior Standing Counsel
More
Recent Posts
- _குருமன்ஸ் சாதிசான்று வழங்கப்பட்டது.*_வழக்கறிஞர்கள் S.துரைசாமி V. இளங்கோவன்
- Adhilashmi Logomoorthy: Legal Eagles Elites presents 100 Hours Crash Course for APP – Preliminary Examination on Zoom
- Writ Petitions, WP 21340 and 21347/2021, challenging the Constitutional validity of Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants
- Madras HC dismissed a batch of 14 Writ Petitions filed by the various promoters challenging proceedings and attachment initiated under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act of 1988
- Full order THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P. No.13284, 13286, 13287, 13289, 13291 & Petitioner : Mr.P.B.Harish For Respondents : Mrs.R.Hemalatha Senior Standing Counsel
