Justice C. Saravanan dismissed the writ petition challenging the bank’s April 2025 order, ruling that the classification was in line with the Reserve Bank of India’s July 2024 circular on fraud prevention, detection, and reporting.

Sign in Join
Sign in
Welcome!Log into your account
your username
your password
Forgot your password?
Create an account
Sign up
Welcome!Register for an account
your email
your username
A password will be e-mailed to you.
Password recovery
Recover your password
your email
Logo
Logo

Search
HomeOther LawsMadras High Court Upholds Bank’s Fraud Classification Despite MSME Protection Plea
Other LawsTop Stories
Madras High Court Upholds Bank’s Fraud Classification Despite MSME Protection Plea
Mariya Paliwala
By
Mariya Paliwala
August, 24, 2025, – 5:27 PM
Madras High Court Upholds Bank’s Fraud Classification Despite MSME Protection Plea

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has upheld Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank’s (TMB) decision to classify a borrower’s loan account as “fraudulent,” rejecting arguments that the borrower was entitled to relief under the Ministry of MSME’s rehabilitation framework.

The bench of Justice C. Saravanan dismissed the writ petition challenging the bank’s April 2025 order, ruling that the classification was in line with the Reserve Bank of India’s July 2024 circular on fraud prevention, detection, and reporting.

The borrower runs a cashew nut processing unit in Kanyakumari. It argued that its business suffered major setbacks due to the imposition of customs duties, demonetization in 2016, and global market resistance, which led to financial losses and made it impossible to repay loans taken from TMB.

The petitioner further contended that the bank wrongly declared the account as a Non-Performing Asset (NPA) and invoked the SARFAESI Act, 2002 without following the mandatory MSME framework. The MSME notification dated May 29, 2015 (S.O.1432(E)) requires banks to first attempt corrective action plans, including rehabilitation or restructuring of loans, through a creditors’ committee before proceeding against an MSME. Instead of following this process, the bank went ahead with asset securitization and fraud classification, which the petitioner claimed was arbitrary and illegal.

The bank argued that the borrower had accumulated dues of over ₹18.65 crore, and the account had been declared NPA as far back as November 2022. After issuing statutory notices under the SARFAESI Act, the bank attempted to auction the secured property multiple times.

The bank also relied on the RBI’s July 2024 circular, which made fraud detection and reporting mandatory for banks. It further cited the Supreme Court’s July 2025 ruling in Swami Samarth Construction, which limited the scope of MSME protections once SARFAESI proceedings advance.

The Court held that the borrower did not invoke the MSME rehabilitation framework in time. The bank’s classification was consistent with the RBI’s 2024 fraud reporting circular. Given the Supreme Court’s latest interpretation, MSME protections cannot be claimed belatedly once recovery proceedings are in motion.

While dismissing the petition, the Court observed that the borrower may still avoid an immediate auction by clearing the outstanding dues of Rs. 18.65 crore.

Case Details

Case Title: M/s. Kirubha Exports Versus The Reserve Bank of India

Case No.: W.P.(MD)No.22136 of 2025

Date: 13.08.2025

Counsel For Petitioner: J.V.Niranjan

Counsel For Respondent: N.Dilip Kumar

Click Here To Read Order
Read More: Arbitrator’s Direction Against GAIL on Rs. 2.27 Crore GST Reimbursement Quashed: Delhi High Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwala

Home

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 5+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies like LiveLaw & Taxscan.JurisHour intellectual property servicesLaw firm services

TagsBank Fraud
RELATED ARTICLES

Notification
ICAI Launches Handbook on Inspection, Search, Seizure and Arrest under GST to Aid Tax Professionals
August 24, 2025
Notification
CII Unveils Comprehensive Reform Agenda to Fast-Track India’s Economic Transformation
August 24, 2025
Notification
CIBIL Score Not Mandatory for First-Time Loan Seekers, Clarifies Finance Ministry
August 24, 2025

Most Popular
ICAI Launches Handbook on Inspection, Search, Seizure and Arrest under GST to Aid Tax Professionals
August 24, 2025
CII Unveils Comprehensive Reform Agenda to Fast-Track India’s Economic Transformation
August 24, 2025
CIBIL Score Not Mandatory for First-Time Loan Seekers, Clarifies Finance Ministry
August 24, 2025
Arbitrator’s Direction Against GAIL on Rs. 2.27 Crore GST Reimbursement Quashed: Delhi High Court
August 24, 2025
Load more

donate

About us
About Jurishour – Juris Hour is an online news portal for reporting accurate and honest news, articles, judgments, Circulars, orders and notifications related to legal developments.JurisHour intellectual property servicesLaw firm services

Company
About Us
Advertise With Us
Contact Us
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Disclaimer
Shipping Policy
Cancellation and Refund Policy
The latest
ICAI Launches Handbook on Inspection, Search, Seizure and Arrest under GST to Aid Tax Professionals
Notification August 24, 2025
CII Unveils Comprehensive Reform Agenda to Fast-Track India’s Economic Transformation
Notification August 24, 2025
CIBIL Score Not Mandatory for First-Time Loan Seekers, Clarifies Finance Ministry
Notification August 24, 2025
© 2025 Juris Hour. All Rights Reserved.JurisHour intellectual property services

notification icon