You may also like...
-
-
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM C.M.A.No.1897 of 2016 —-In view of the fact that the appellant could not able to establish any discrepancy or illegality in the matter of initiation of suo motu proceedings initiated under Section 47-A(6) of the Indian Stamps Act and further, the determination of market value was done by following the procedures as contemplated under the Valuation Rules, this Court do not find any infirmity or perversity and accordingly, the order passed under Section 47-A(6) of Indian Stamp Act in proceedings dated 12.08.2016 stands confirmed and the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal in C.M.A.No.1897 of 2016 is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 24, 2021
-
[3/4, 16:34] Vijayaragan Mhc Advt: *Breaking:* The Supreme Court today held that Consumer Courts cannot grant time to the opposite party to file a reply beyond a total period of 45 days, as mandated under Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act. *Read more at* http://bit.ly/2x9CLhh Download our App ! Android & iOS: *http://onelink.to/t9agbr* [3/4, 16:35] Sekarreporter 1: 🍁
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 4, 2020