You may also like...
-
Full order of THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN Writ Petition Nos. 4711 and 4717 of 2019 — 1. M. Ramesh 2. Ambika .. Petitioners in WP No. 4711 –For Petitioner : Mr. S. Anil Sandeep in both the Writ Petitions For Respondents : Mr. Stalin Abimanyu Government Counsel in both the Writ Petitions COMMON ORDER. – 23. In the above facts and circumstances of this case, the first respondent – Chief Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu is directed to issue necessary appropriate instruction as are necessary to the District Collectors and other authorities in the State to ensure that after expiry of the period of lease, the lease holders must fence the site and provide other safety parameters so that no such untoward incident will occur in future. 24. Accordingly, both the writ petitions are allowed. No costs. The fourth respondent is directed to disburse the amount of Rs.25,31,250/- with accrued interest, equally to the petitioners as compensation, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, notwithstanding the sum of Rs.50,000/- each already paid to the petitioners–
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 6, 2021
-
https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1729748332308812069?t=I6mHyUVTtVdJCiH3csW5pg&s=08 The Learned Senior Counsel R. singaravelan appearing for the petitioner relied on Seshammal’s case, wherein it is held “that if any rule is framed by the Government which purports to interfere with the rituals and ceremonies of the temples the same will be liable to be challenged by those who are interested in the temple worship”. In the present case since the respondents are trying to interfere with the Agama under the guise of training, hence the petitioner submitted the same is against the interest of the temple worship. After hearing the submissions on the either side this Court is of the considered opinion that the issue need elaborate hearing, only then it can be considered whether the petitioner’s rights are affected. Hence this Court proceeds to deal with the issues raised by the petitioner.
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 29, 2023
-
https://twitter.com/PWilsonDMK/status/1219847355215663104?s=08 [1/22, 10:36] sekarreporter1: The Prl bench of IPAB was setup at Chennai due to the efforts of then Min forCommerce MrMurasoli Maran. JusJagadeesan was the 1st chairman of the IPAB.Jus Prabhasridhevan and Jus KN Basha https://t.co/MDk7iEj5Cy is the only Tribunal which has Principal Bench in Chennai;Save IPAB.
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 22, 2020