Follow:
- Next story Court refuses to quash charge memo issued to District Judge Chief Justice Amreshwar Pratap Sahi and Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy held that it would not be appropriate to disable the High Court administration from proceeding with the inquiry since the alleged misconduct, if proved to be true, would entail serious consequences leading to imposition of a major punishment on the suspended district judge.Chief Justice Amreshwar Pratap Sahi and Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy held that it would not be appropriate to disable the High Court administration from proceeding with the inquiry since the alleged misconduct, if proved to be true, would entail serious consequences leading to imposition of a major punishment on the suspended district judge.
- Previous story https://www.nakkheeran.in/24-by-7-news/thamizhagam/chennai-highcourt-10 [8/27, 09:13] Sekarreporter 1: உதவி ஆய்வாளர் பணிக்கான எழுத்து தேர்வு முறைகேட்டினால் மறுதேர்வு நடத்தக் கோரிய மனுவுக்கு பதிலளிக்க தமிழக அரசுக்கு உயர்நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு! –
Recent Posts
- http://youtube.com/post/UgkxAg7kpujWvtL21sksgS9DADuOI7cxFU0c?si=3B8lW4sX0GKhDmRc [18/06, 18:19] sekarreporter1: [18/06, 18:17] sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-judge-expected-to-engage-with-bar-not-sit-like-sphinx-538236 [18/06, 18:17] sekarreporter1: The Madras High Court recently observed that the Indian Evidence Act enables a judge to ask any question that he pleases during trial with respect to any relevant or irrelevant fact during the trial. [2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 269] The bench of Justice GR Swaminathan and Justice R Poornima held
- National Investigation Agency #NIA appropriates ₹1.13 crore of fees paid by a Bihari woman medical student who had pursued MBBS course at a private college in Chennai. The agency takes the action after booking her brother and uncle under UAPA for having allegedly collected funds for banned maoist activities in Jharkhand. #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice’s Bench rejects the student’s plea to direct the college to issue a course completion certificate to her. Judges say she cannot assert an equitable right to benefit from the proceeds of a crime.i
- [18/06, 15:34] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxZv20Knss850Ix7rH8aaB_Y9Bquvj1ABy?si=9-o-8N9ytF4ECelb [18/06, 15:34] sekarreporter1: Judge should not sit like a sphinx, must engage with lawyers during hearings: Madras High Court | https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/judge-should-not-sit-like-a-sphinx-must-engage-with-lawyers-during-hearings-madras-high-court
- https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-mbbs-student-fee-seized-nia-maoist-connection-no-relief-538177 [18/06, 13:10] sekarreporter1: The Madras High Court recently refused to set aside an order of a single judge dismissing a student’s plea asking Chettinad Academy of Research and Education to grant her course
- THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.A.No.2422 of 2025 and CMP N os .18594 and 18595 of 2025 Puja Kumari, R/o. Village-Rustampur, P.O.- Hulasganj, P.S.-Ghoshi, District-Jahanabad, Bihar-804407, Currently residing at Sandhya Niwas, 69A Apartments, Nehru Nagar, Road, No.2, Patliputra, Patna, Bihar-800 013. Appellant(s) Vs 1. The Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi-110 011. 2. The President National Medical Commission, Pocket 14, Sector 8, Dwarka Phase 1, New Delhi – 110 077. 3. The Secretary Tamil Nadu Medical Council, 914, Poonamallee High Road, Arumbakkam, Chennai-600 016. 4. The Director General National Investigation Agency, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi – 110 003. 5. The Dean Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, OMR, Kelambakkam, Chengalpattu, Chennai – 603 103. Respondent(s)
More
Recent Posts
- http://youtube.com/post/UgkxAg7kpujWvtL21sksgS9DADuOI7cxFU0c?si=3B8lW4sX0GKhDmRc [18/06, 18:19] sekarreporter1: [18/06, 18:17] sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-judge-expected-to-engage-with-bar-not-sit-like-sphinx-538236 [18/06, 18:17] sekarreporter1: The Madras High Court recently observed that the Indian Evidence Act enables a judge to ask any question that he pleases during trial with respect to any relevant or irrelevant fact during the trial. [2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 269] The bench of Justice GR Swaminathan and Justice R Poornima held
- National Investigation Agency #NIA appropriates ₹1.13 crore of fees paid by a Bihari woman medical student who had pursued MBBS course at a private college in Chennai. The agency takes the action after booking her brother and uncle under UAPA for having allegedly collected funds for banned maoist activities in Jharkhand. #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice’s Bench rejects the student’s plea to direct the college to issue a course completion certificate to her. Judges say she cannot assert an equitable right to benefit from the proceeds of a crime.i
- [18/06, 15:34] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxZv20Knss850Ix7rH8aaB_Y9Bquvj1ABy?si=9-o-8N9ytF4ECelb [18/06, 15:34] sekarreporter1: Judge should not sit like a sphinx, must engage with lawyers during hearings: Madras High Court | https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/judge-should-not-sit-like-a-sphinx-must-engage-with-lawyers-during-hearings-madras-high-court
- https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-mbbs-student-fee-seized-nia-maoist-connection-no-relief-538177 [18/06, 13:10] sekarreporter1: The Madras High Court recently refused to set aside an order of a single judge dismissing a student’s plea asking Chettinad Academy of Research and Education to grant her course
- THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.A.No.2422 of 2025 and CMP N os .18594 and 18595 of 2025 Puja Kumari, R/o. Village-Rustampur, P.O.- Hulasganj, P.S.-Ghoshi, District-Jahanabad, Bihar-804407, Currently residing at Sandhya Niwas, 69A Apartments, Nehru Nagar, Road, No.2, Patliputra, Patna, Bihar-800 013. Appellant(s) Vs 1. The Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi-110 011. 2. The President National Medical Commission, Pocket 14, Sector 8, Dwarka Phase 1, New Delhi – 110 077. 3. The Secretary Tamil Nadu Medical Council, 914, Poonamallee High Road, Arumbakkam, Chennai-600 016. 4. The Director General National Investigation Agency, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi – 110 003. 5. The Dean Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, OMR, Kelambakkam, Chengalpattu, Chennai – 603 103. Respondent(s)