Follow:
- Next story இளவரசர் சார்லஸ்- முதல்வர் எம்ஜிஆர்
- Previous story Mhc advocate J.Ravinthiren good speech in chandru law academy law class
Recent Posts
- THE HON’BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP No. 6248 of 2026 Tamilazhagan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Prison Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009 2. The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons Whannels Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008 3. The Superintendent of prisons, Central prison-I, Puzhal, Chennai-600 066 4. The Tamil Nadu State Legal Services
- Dismissed ponmudy case order. HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL RC No. 645 of 2026 AND CRL MP NO. 4867 OF 2026 K.Ponmudi S/o.late.M.Kandaswamy
- Election Commissioner of India, the six resigned MLAs concerned, the Union Ministry of Law & Justice, and the Hon’ble Speaker of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, in strict conformity with professional practice and as a responsible Senior Lawyer, thereby ensuring that all constitutional stakeholders were placed on notice contemporaneously. S.Kasiramalingam M.A.B.L., Advocate
- [02/07, 17:24] sekarreporter1: Madras HC Holds Civil Dispute Over Wharfage Refund Cannot Be Tried As Criminal Offence, Quashes CBI Case https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/wharfage-refund-dispute-cannot-be-given-criminal-colour-539344 [02/07, 17:25] sekarreporter1: “For Petitioner: Mr. B. Sathish Sundar, Mr.R. Rajarathinam, Sc for Mr.S. Arunachalam For Respondent: Mr. K. Srinivasan, Special Public Prosecutor” https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/wharfage-refund-dispute-cannot-be-given-criminal-colour-539344#:~:text=For%20Petitioner%3A,Special%20Public%20Prosecutor
- Hon’ble Court observed that the writ petition had been taken up at a very late stage, when the Special TNTET examination was scheduled to be conducted within a short time. In view of the imminent examination, the Court indicated that the present examination may proceed in accordance with the existing notification and that the petitioners should participate in the examination under the present scheme.
More
Recent Posts
- THE HON’BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP No. 6248 of 2026 Tamilazhagan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Prison Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009 2. The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons Whannels Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008 3. The Superintendent of prisons, Central prison-I, Puzhal, Chennai-600 066 4. The Tamil Nadu State Legal Services
- Dismissed ponmudy case order. HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL RC No. 645 of 2026 AND CRL MP NO. 4867 OF 2026 K.Ponmudi S/o.late.M.Kandaswamy
- Election Commissioner of India, the six resigned MLAs concerned, the Union Ministry of Law & Justice, and the Hon’ble Speaker of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, in strict conformity with professional practice and as a responsible Senior Lawyer, thereby ensuring that all constitutional stakeholders were placed on notice contemporaneously. S.Kasiramalingam M.A.B.L., Advocate
- [02/07, 17:24] sekarreporter1: Madras HC Holds Civil Dispute Over Wharfage Refund Cannot Be Tried As Criminal Offence, Quashes CBI Case https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/wharfage-refund-dispute-cannot-be-given-criminal-colour-539344 [02/07, 17:25] sekarreporter1: “For Petitioner: Mr. B. Sathish Sundar, Mr.R. Rajarathinam, Sc for Mr.S. Arunachalam For Respondent: Mr. K. Srinivasan, Special Public Prosecutor” https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/wharfage-refund-dispute-cannot-be-given-criminal-colour-539344#:~:text=For%20Petitioner%3A,Special%20Public%20Prosecutor
- Hon’ble Court observed that the writ petition had been taken up at a very late stage, when the Special TNTET examination was scheduled to be conducted within a short time. In view of the imminent examination, the Court indicated that the present examination may proceed in accordance with the existing notification and that the petitioners should participate in the examination under the present scheme.