![[12/10, 18:33] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1337019978747314178?s=08 [12/10, 18:33] Sekarreporter1: நீட் தேர்வெழுதிய மாணவர்களின் ஒ.எம்.ஆர் விடைத்தாள்களில் முறைகேடுகள் நடைபெற வாய்ப்புள்ளதா என விசாரித்து அறிக்கை தாக்கல் செய்ய, தேசிய தேர்வு முகமைக்கு சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது..for students m ravi Priya ravi advt argued](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story MRS. JUSTICE N. MALA AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN W.P. No.17422 of 2025 and W.M.P. Nos.19755 and 19757 of 2025 Muthukumar J. …. Petitioner vs. The Principal Secretary, The State of Tamil Nadu, Department of Home,
- Previous story Head notes /M Ravi Advocate / A) Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1955 – Rule 17(b) – Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 – Delay in disciplinary proceedings – Petitioner, a Village Administrative Officer, was dismissed after a decade-long delay in proceedings for alleged irregularities in land issuance – The court found the delay prejudicial and discriminatory, as co-delinquents faced lesser penalties – The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in disciplinary matters. (Paras 3, 4, 25, 27
Recent Posts
- MRS. JUSTICE N. MALA AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN W.P. No.17422 of 2025 and W.M.P. Nos.19755 and 19757 of 2025 Muthukumar J. …. Petitioner vs. The Principal Secretary, The State of Tamil Nadu, Department of Home,
- Inviting CJ/APP and DJ Aspirants . ONLINE /OFFLINE SUBJECT : The BNS 2023
- Head notes /M Ravi Advocate / A) Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1955 – Rule 17(b) – Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 – Delay in disciplinary proceedings – Petitioner, a Village Administrative Officer, was dismissed after a decade-long delay in proceedings for alleged irregularities in land issuance – The court found the delay prejudicial and discriminatory, as co-delinquents faced lesser penalties – The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in disciplinary matters. (Paras 3, 4, 25, 27
- Kanadasan son case mhc order
- Justice Mrs.Mala as Item No.24. Where Senior Advocate and Former State PP Mr.A.Natarajan appeared for the son of Kaviarasu Kannadhasan and sought the court intervention against the rejection order passed by Tamil Nadu EB department, who refused to provide EB connection
More
Recent Posts
- MRS. JUSTICE N. MALA AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN W.P. No.17422 of 2025 and W.M.P. Nos.19755 and 19757 of 2025 Muthukumar J. …. Petitioner vs. The Principal Secretary, The State of Tamil Nadu, Department of Home,
- Inviting CJ/APP and DJ Aspirants . ONLINE /OFFLINE SUBJECT : The BNS 2023
- Head notes /M Ravi Advocate / A) Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1955 – Rule 17(b) – Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 – Delay in disciplinary proceedings – Petitioner, a Village Administrative Officer, was dismissed after a decade-long delay in proceedings for alleged irregularities in land issuance – The court found the delay prejudicial and discriminatory, as co-delinquents faced lesser penalties – The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in disciplinary matters. (Paras 3, 4, 25, 27
- Kanadasan son case mhc order
- Justice Mrs.Mala as Item No.24. Where Senior Advocate and Former State PP Mr.A.Natarajan appeared for the son of Kaviarasu Kannadhasan and sought the court intervention against the rejection order passed by Tamil Nadu EB department, who refused to provide EB connection
