Follow:
- Next story Cpc G. Surya Narayanan Mhc Advt: Citation for Section 152, order 6 rule 17; order 2 rule 2 posted yesterday 2009(4) SCJ 417 [12/18, 17:45] Cpc G. Surya Narayanan Mhc Advt: ORDER LXI RULE 4 – 2009(4) SCJ 623 A.P. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION VS. BALOJI BADHAVATH
- Previous story Tv symbol கேட்டு புதிய தமிழகம் கட்சி வழக்கு lordship ஆதிகேசவலு order notice [12/19, 12:28] Sekarreporter 1: For
Recent Posts
- Full court reference for former judge y venkatachalam
- 6/29, 16:52] Sekarreporter: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1542106282496507905?t=ZqPmr6xBZBCYdUj9LOPw9g&s=08 [6/29, 16:53] Sekarreporter: Today the Division Bench of Hon’ble High Court of Madras led by Hon’ble Chief Justice heard a matter in seeking change of inquiry officer in an inquiry proceedings being conducted against a judicial officer. The Hon’ble High Court heard the arguments of learned Senior Counsel Mr S Prabakaran for the petitioner/ judicial officer and learned counsel Karthik Ranganathan appeared for the Registrar General of the High Court and
- Chief bench Nalini case govt new affidavit In view of the above, it is most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble High Court may be pleased to modify the order dated 17.06.2022 passed in W.P.No.7615 of 2022 by deleting the following observations; Paragraph No.11:
- Exellent judgement delivered by Honourable Justice A D Jagathish chandira dt 28/6/22 Regarding EJC Last seen theory Circumstantial evidence Three cases iam handling now for which this judgement is so apt R Subramaniya adhityan Thoothukudi [6/29, 16:01] Sekarreporter:
- THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Criminal Appeal No.737 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.15638 of 2018 Dinesh Appellant JUDGMENT (By : A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA,J.) In. view of the above laches found in the case of the prosecution, we have no hesitation in holding that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond reasonable doubts and therefore, it would not be safe to convict the appellant/accused for the offences alleged against him. Accordingly, we allow the Criminal Appeal setting aside the judgment of conviction and sentence rendered by the Principal Sessions Judge in S.C.No.200 of 2016 dated 30.10.2018.
More
Recent Posts
- Full court reference for former judge y venkatachalam
- 6/29, 16:52] Sekarreporter: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1542106282496507905?t=ZqPmr6xBZBCYdUj9LOPw9g&s=08 [6/29, 16:53] Sekarreporter: Today the Division Bench of Hon’ble High Court of Madras led by Hon’ble Chief Justice heard a matter in seeking change of inquiry officer in an inquiry proceedings being conducted against a judicial officer. The Hon’ble High Court heard the arguments of learned Senior Counsel Mr S Prabakaran for the petitioner/ judicial officer and learned counsel Karthik Ranganathan appeared for the Registrar General of the High Court and
- Chief bench Nalini case govt new affidavit In view of the above, it is most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble High Court may be pleased to modify the order dated 17.06.2022 passed in W.P.No.7615 of 2022 by deleting the following observations; Paragraph No.11:
- Exellent judgement delivered by Honourable Justice A D Jagathish chandira dt 28/6/22 Regarding EJC Last seen theory Circumstantial evidence Three cases iam handling now for which this judgement is so apt R Subramaniya adhityan Thoothukudi [6/29, 16:01] Sekarreporter:
- THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Criminal Appeal No.737 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.15638 of 2018 Dinesh Appellant JUDGMENT (By : A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA,J.) In. view of the above laches found in the case of the prosecution, we have no hesitation in holding that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond reasonable doubts and therefore, it would not be safe to convict the appellant/accused for the offences alleged against him. Accordingly, we allow the Criminal Appeal setting aside the judgment of conviction and sentence rendered by the Principal Sessions Judge in S.C.No.200 of 2016 dated 30.10.2018.
