High court judges age increase bill.and sc bench bill senior advt p wilson interview
https://youtu.be/pAVn-6W__Ho
![[11/18, 08:15] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1328891935436677120?s=08 [11/18, 08:15] Sekarreporter 1: [11/18, 08:05] Manuj Dmk Advt: Article by Advocate Manuraj Shunmugasundaram, appeared in today’s The Hindu, on how the inaction and inordinate delay by the Governor in disposing/ deciding on the Article 161 petition filed by Perarivalan has given rise to an extraordinary situation, which may require the Supreme Court to now issue directions to the Governor. https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/constitutional-fault-lines/article33120499.ece [11/18, 08:13] Sekarreporter 1: Super](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story ஸ்டெர்லைட் ஆலையில் ஆக்சிஜன் உற்பத்தி செய்ய உச்சநீதிமன்றம் அளித்த கால அவகாசம் முடிவடைந்த நிலையில் ஆலைக்கு வழங்கப்பட்டு வந்த தண்ணீர் நிறுத்தம் செய்யப்பட்டுள்ளது.
- Previous story சிபிஐ வக்கீல் சந்திரசேகர் சாருக்கு அருமையான வாழ.த்து மடல் படியுங்கள் 80 லிலும் கர் ஜிக்கும்சிம்ம குரல்
Recent Posts
- THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-05-2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WMP No.21519 & 21523 of 2026 in WP No. 20111 of 2026 T.R.Ramesh ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600
- Justice C Kumarappan observed that while the court has to exercise its discretion in a humane and compassionate manner, considering the past conduct, there was every possibility of delaying the trial.
- Author is a Senior Advocate at the Madras High Court and an International Energy Law Consultant. He advises Indian public sector undertakings and private entities on cross-border energy, critical minerals, and ECTA trade law, with offices in Chennai, New Delhi, and a FIFO venue in Sydney.
- Ed k n neru In these circumstances and taking into consideration the statement of the then Advocate General made at the Bar, we direct the State authorities not to undertake any further proceedings against any of the parties till the next date of hearing. 8. List these cases on 23.6.2026 as already directed on 28.4.2026. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 05.06.2026 sasi
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.1004 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.1046 of 2026 1. Gnanasekaran 2. Shanmugasundharam 3. Sundaramoorthi … Petitioners/Accused Vs. 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by. the Inspector of Police, Thandikudi Police Station, Dindigul District. Crime No. 157 of 2012. …. Respondent / Complainant 2. Paneerselvam ….. Respondent / Defacto Complainant
More
Recent Posts
- THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-05-2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WMP No.21519 & 21523 of 2026 in WP No. 20111 of 2026 T.R.Ramesh ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600
- Justice C Kumarappan observed that while the court has to exercise its discretion in a humane and compassionate manner, considering the past conduct, there was every possibility of delaying the trial.
- Author is a Senior Advocate at the Madras High Court and an International Energy Law Consultant. He advises Indian public sector undertakings and private entities on cross-border energy, critical minerals, and ECTA trade law, with offices in Chennai, New Delhi, and a FIFO venue in Sydney.
- Ed k n neru In these circumstances and taking into consideration the statement of the then Advocate General made at the Bar, we direct the State authorities not to undertake any further proceedings against any of the parties till the next date of hearing. 8. List these cases on 23.6.2026 as already directed on 28.4.2026. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 05.06.2026 sasi
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.1004 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.1046 of 2026 1. Gnanasekaran 2. Shanmugasundharam 3. Sundaramoorthi … Petitioners/Accused Vs. 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by. the Inspector of Police, Thandikudi Police Station, Dindigul District. Crime No. 157 of 2012. …. Respondent / Complainant 2. Paneerselvam ….. Respondent / Defacto Complainant