You may also like...
[1/26, 15:49] Sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/k0EVIsIGrfU [1/26, 17:19] Sekarreporter1: [1/26, 17:17] Sanjai Gandhi: I heard Hon’ble Justice Lordship Mr. Kirubakaran’s speech at the Swearing-in ceremony of the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry today, the 26th of January, 2021 and found it inspiring for young lawyers. This speech is very pertinent to the entire Legal Fraternity. Truly yours, P. Sanjai Gandhi President Intellectual property rights attorney association, Chennai. [1/26, 17:17] Sekarreporter1: ☘️☘️
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 26, 2021
His Lordship Justice S.Vaidyanathan Judge dismissed the Writ Petition and disagreeing with the decision rendered by this Court in S.Balasubramanian and others vs. State, reported in (2013) 2 LW (Cri) 289, referred the matter to a Larger Bench to decide the following issues: i) Whether a Company should be made as a party, when the Government is going to sanction prosecution under Section 29 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for not implementing the provisions of the Act against persons falling under Section 32 of the Act, 1947; ii) Whether a Company should be made as a party, when the words “as well as the Company” are absent under Section 32 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as the same is not in pari materia with the provisions of Section 141 of the N.I.Act. [6/7, 14:48] Sekarreporter1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11.02.2021 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.No.2869 of 2021
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 7, 2021
Justice M.S. Ramesh while quashing the notices issued by the Joint DGFT said that as and when the Joint DGFT had issued the EPCG license and the Export Obligation Discharge Certificate, he becomes “functus officio” and if at all, such an order is to be reviewed, the same can be done only by the Director-General, as provided under Section 16.
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 9, 2020