Follow:
- Next story Justice M. Dhandapani ruled so while quashing two Government Orders, issued in September 2014, for prosecuting the Resident Editor and branch head of an English newspaper and the publisher of a Tamil daily for having published the contents of a letter written by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy to Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
- Previous story The Madras High Court has held that in the case of an error in short-levy of service tax, for the purpose of ratifying the assessee is left with 2 options either by suo-moto or by paying the tax ascertained by the Central Excise and Service officer before the serving of notice.
Recent Posts
- 28/03, 16:03] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1773297173196587123?t=aFfpqod6t-PmA017f_eCXQ&s=08[28/03, 16:03] sekarreporter1: Honorable Mrs. Justice Anitha Sumanth of MadrasbHigh court directed the Regional Passport Authority to issue a passport with a validity of 10 years to Mr. Karthi P. Chidambaram after hearing the arguments of Mr. P. Wilson, senior advocate appearing for the sitting MP.
- 45.For the aforesaid reasons, the request of the appellants are taken on record and the Writ Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.46.Even though we have found that the impleading petitioner has a locus standi to be represented in these Intra Court Appeals in view of the withdrawal of these Intra Court Appeals, it would be a futile exercise to order the impleading petitions, hence the Application for impleading are closed as unnecessary. However, there shall be no order as to costs.(R.S.K.,J.) (K.B., J.)28.03.2024Index: YesSpeaking Order Neutral Citation:YespbnR.SURESH KUMAR., J. and K.KUMARESH BABU.,J.pbnWrit Appeal Nos.847 & 850 of 2019& CMP. No.17216 & 17220 of 202328.03.2024
- [28/03, 14:22] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1773271895485317200?t=MsfEAHmgmHmp4lev5b-VaA&s=08[28/03, 14:23] sekarreporter1: Crl.M.P.No.1322 of 2024 inCrl.O.P.No.7699 of 2023A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.The present petition has been filed by a victimized complainant seeking cancellation of bail granted by this court in Crl.O.P.No.7699 of 2023 to the second respondent herein in respect of offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 448, 420, 506(2) IPC in Crime No.426 of 2022 on the file of the first respondent herein, contending that the second respondent herein had misrepresented this court for getting the bail and he had not fulfilled the condition imposed by this court while granting the bail.
- Justice A.D. Jagadish Chandira said, crimes of such nature were on the increase in and around Chennai due to lack of awareness among the people and therefore, it was incumbent upon the State to warn them by publicising the modus operandi adopted by the fradusters.
- Today, the Writ Appeals filed by the State challenging an order of the High Court quashing G.O. 721 which was issued by the AIADMK government to hand over files of the Regupathy Commission of Inquiry to the DVAC were permitted to be withdrawn by a Hon’ble Division Bench comprising of Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. Suresh Kumar & Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kumaresh Babu.
More
Recent Posts
- 28/03, 16:03] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1773297173196587123?t=aFfpqod6t-PmA017f_eCXQ&s=08[28/03, 16:03] sekarreporter1: Honorable Mrs. Justice Anitha Sumanth of MadrasbHigh court directed the Regional Passport Authority to issue a passport with a validity of 10 years to Mr. Karthi P. Chidambaram after hearing the arguments of Mr. P. Wilson, senior advocate appearing for the sitting MP.
- 45.For the aforesaid reasons, the request of the appellants are taken on record and the Writ Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.46.Even though we have found that the impleading petitioner has a locus standi to be represented in these Intra Court Appeals in view of the withdrawal of these Intra Court Appeals, it would be a futile exercise to order the impleading petitions, hence the Application for impleading are closed as unnecessary. However, there shall be no order as to costs.(R.S.K.,J.) (K.B., J.)28.03.2024Index: YesSpeaking Order Neutral Citation:YespbnR.SURESH KUMAR., J. and K.KUMARESH BABU.,J.pbnWrit Appeal Nos.847 & 850 of 2019& CMP. No.17216 & 17220 of 202328.03.2024
- [28/03, 14:22] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1773271895485317200?t=MsfEAHmgmHmp4lev5b-VaA&s=08[28/03, 14:23] sekarreporter1: Crl.M.P.No.1322 of 2024 inCrl.O.P.No.7699 of 2023A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.The present petition has been filed by a victimized complainant seeking cancellation of bail granted by this court in Crl.O.P.No.7699 of 2023 to the second respondent herein in respect of offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 448, 420, 506(2) IPC in Crime No.426 of 2022 on the file of the first respondent herein, contending that the second respondent herein had misrepresented this court for getting the bail and he had not fulfilled the condition imposed by this court while granting the bail.
- Justice A.D. Jagadish Chandira said, crimes of such nature were on the increase in and around Chennai due to lack of awareness among the people and therefore, it was incumbent upon the State to warn them by publicising the modus operandi adopted by the fradusters.
- Today, the Writ Appeals filed by the State challenging an order of the High Court quashing G.O. 721 which was issued by the AIADMK government to hand over files of the Regupathy Commission of Inquiry to the DVAC were permitted to be withdrawn by a Hon’ble Division Bench comprising of Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. Suresh Kumar & Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kumaresh Babu.