Follow:
- Next story UPDATES’Do You Want To Make This Country An Open Jail’ : Justice (Retd) Chandru Speaks Against CAA-NRC
- Previous story [12/30, 16:40] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1211605395753463809?s=08 [12/30, 16:40] Sekarreporter 1: [12/30, 16:25] Karventhan Vidurhaisiruthai: The Opposition parties DMK, VCK and others filed a batch of writ petitions seeking for video coverage of counting of votes in local bodies elections through out tamilnadu and a direction to comply with rules 60 to 69 of TN Panchayat Elections Rules 1996, based on the representations sent by the opposition parties to State Election Commission. All the writ petition came up for hearing before the Honble Vacation Bench of Madras High Court today. The Opposition Parties were represented by various counsels under the lead of Senior Counsel Mr.N.R.Elango, on behalf of DMK’s party functionary Mr.R.S.Bharathi, MP, Rajya Sabha and Ms.S.Deepika, Counsel representing VCK Legal wing Secretary Mr.D.Parventhan. whereas State Election Commission was represented by Senior Counsel Mr.Ar.L.Sunderesan. it was represented by State Election Commission that when they are strictly following the chapter VI (Rules 60 to 69) of TN Panchayat Rules, there is no question of directing them by way of mandamus sought by the Petitioners. In the course of arguement and in the Counter Affidavit filed by Commission, it was informed that the Returning Officers are instructed to install CCTV Cameras in counting booths and the coverage would not be only focussing the ballot papers which was vehemently opposed by all the Petitioner Counsels and district wise malpractices and incidents were reported before the court. Quiet interestingly, the State Government And Election Commission submitted that the Writ Petitions are merely based and presumptions and apprehensions and no past history was recorded. Whereas the same was countered by Petitioner’s Counsel that their (commission) own circular admitted about the past history of malpractices and booth capturing etc., Ultimately the Election Commission conceded to the fact that they would delete the line mentioning about the ” recording would not cover ballot papers ” in their circular dated 13.12.2019. Recording their ( State Election Commission) submission that the counting process would be videographed in the presence of candidates and their agents, the Writ Petitions are disposed of. [12/30, 16:26] Sekarreporter 1: 👍
Recent Posts
- THE HON’BLE Ms.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA C.R.P.Nos.587 & 1937 of 2022 and C.M.P.Nos.3065 and 3343 of 2022 C.R.P.No.587 of 2022 M/s.Primex Healthcare and Research Pvt. Ltd., Rep by its Director, In any case, the learned Rent Controller need not have rejected the petition, since the rent agreement is a written one and is still in force. Instead, the petition could have been returned to comply the registration formalities under Rule 4 of the New Rent Rules and represent it after compliance. Since the agreement period is going to expire shortly, if the landlord complies the registration formalities of the Act, he can get a green signal for eviction under Section 5(1) also” Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. For Petitioner : Mr.Anirudh Krishnan For Respondent : Mr.M.L.Ganesh In C.R.P.No.1937 of 2022 For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sunil Kumar C O M M O N O R D E R
- Rule 37 amendment – Implications for taxpayers OCTOBER 07, 2022 By K Aarthy, Advocate, G N Law Associates IN GST regime, the credit of input taxes charged on any supply of goods and services or both can be availed by the taxpayers subject to conditions prescribed in Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017
- Mhc orders oct 6
- worshipping of a god cannot be stopped by closing of the temple due to the dispute between the two rival groups. THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU P(MD)No.23296 of 2022and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.17384 and 17385 of 2022 K.Seeni Thevar For Petitioner : Mr.C.Selvaraj For R1, R2 & R4 : Mr.D.Gandhiraj, Special Government Pleader For R3 : Mr.S.Manohar O R D E R
- The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI CRL OP(MD). No.17679 of 2021 Umamaheswari … Petitioner/Defacto Complainant Vs.
More
Recent Posts
- THE HON’BLE Ms.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA C.R.P.Nos.587 & 1937 of 2022 and C.M.P.Nos.3065 and 3343 of 2022 C.R.P.No.587 of 2022 M/s.Primex Healthcare and Research Pvt. Ltd., Rep by its Director, In any case, the learned Rent Controller need not have rejected the petition, since the rent agreement is a written one and is still in force. Instead, the petition could have been returned to comply the registration formalities under Rule 4 of the New Rent Rules and represent it after compliance. Since the agreement period is going to expire shortly, if the landlord complies the registration formalities of the Act, he can get a green signal for eviction under Section 5(1) also” Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. For Petitioner : Mr.Anirudh Krishnan For Respondent : Mr.M.L.Ganesh In C.R.P.No.1937 of 2022 For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sunil Kumar C O M M O N O R D E R
- Rule 37 amendment – Implications for taxpayers OCTOBER 07, 2022 By K Aarthy, Advocate, G N Law Associates IN GST regime, the credit of input taxes charged on any supply of goods and services or both can be availed by the taxpayers subject to conditions prescribed in Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017
- Mhc orders oct 6
- worshipping of a god cannot be stopped by closing of the temple due to the dispute between the two rival groups. THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU P(MD)No.23296 of 2022and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.17384 and 17385 of 2022 K.Seeni Thevar For Petitioner : Mr.C.Selvaraj For R1, R2 & R4 : Mr.D.Gandhiraj, Special Government Pleader For R3 : Mr.S.Manohar O R D E R
- The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI CRL OP(MD). No.17679 of 2021 Umamaheswari … Petitioner/Defacto Complainant Vs.
