![: Good evening sir, i am Arun Saravanan ( Advocate ), i had move a PIL before madras high court regarding the welfare of the private sector employees , and the same has been admitted by Hon’ble madras high court [4/24, 21:16] Chennai Advt: Msnj & Nkj [4/24, 21:16] Chennai Advt: M.sathyanaran justice & Nirmal kumar justice sir](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story UPDATES’Do You Want To Make This Country An Open Jail’ : Justice (Retd) Chandru Speaks Against CAA-NRC
- Previous story [12/30, 16:40] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1211605395753463809?s=08 [12/30, 16:40] Sekarreporter 1: [12/30, 16:25] Karventhan Vidurhaisiruthai: The Opposition parties DMK, VCK and others filed a batch of writ petitions seeking for video coverage of counting of votes in local bodies elections through out tamilnadu and a direction to comply with rules 60 to 69 of TN Panchayat Elections Rules 1996, based on the representations sent by the opposition parties to State Election Commission. All the writ petition came up for hearing before the Honble Vacation Bench of Madras High Court today. The Opposition Parties were represented by various counsels under the lead of Senior Counsel Mr.N.R.Elango, on behalf of DMK’s party functionary Mr.R.S.Bharathi, MP, Rajya Sabha and Ms.S.Deepika, Counsel representing VCK Legal wing Secretary Mr.D.Parventhan. whereas State Election Commission was represented by Senior Counsel Mr.Ar.L.Sunderesan. it was represented by State Election Commission that when they are strictly following the chapter VI (Rules 60 to 69) of TN Panchayat Rules, there is no question of directing them by way of mandamus sought by the Petitioners. In the course of arguement and in the Counter Affidavit filed by Commission, it was informed that the Returning Officers are instructed to install CCTV Cameras in counting booths and the coverage would not be only focussing the ballot papers which was vehemently opposed by all the Petitioner Counsels and district wise malpractices and incidents were reported before the court. Quiet interestingly, the State Government And Election Commission submitted that the Writ Petitions are merely based and presumptions and apprehensions and no past history was recorded. Whereas the same was countered by Petitioner’s Counsel that their (commission) own circular admitted about the past history of malpractices and booth capturing etc., Ultimately the Election Commission conceded to the fact that they would delete the line mentioning about the ” recording would not cover ballot papers ” in their circular dated 13.12.2019. Recording their ( State Election Commission) submission that the counting process would be videographed in the presence of candidates and their agents, the Writ Petitions are disposed of. [12/30, 16:26] Sekarreporter 1: 👍
Recent Posts
- MR. JUSTICE C. KUMARAPPAN Writ Petition No.22169 of 2025 and Writ Miscellaneous Petition No.
- We should have ordered restoration of possession to the petitioner. Since the area encroached is land belonging to the Highways, we do not resort to restoration. We direct the Government to pay a compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- to the petitioner within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Government may recover the said compensation from the officers who are responsible for carrying out the erroneous eviction drive by taking law into their own hands without following the procedure contemplated under the Act. 10. This Contempt Petition is disposed of as above. (R.S.M., J.) (P.B.B., J.) 08.07.2025 dsa Index : No Internet : Yes Neutral Citation : No Speaking order R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and P.B.BALAJI, J. dsa Contempt Petition No.3436 of 2024 08.07.20
- Secretary to Government, Home Department, State of Tamil Nadu and the Registrar General, Madras High Court are expected to issue a comprehensive circular in this regard. With the above observations and directions, this criminal appeal stands disposed of. Internet : Yes 09.07.2025 gk Note: Mark a copy of this order to 1.The Secretary to Government, Home Department, State of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Registrar General, Madras High Court. To 1.The Inspector of Police, NIB CID, Trichy District. 2.The Judge, Additional District Court for EC and NDPS Act Cases, Pudukottai. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk Crl.A(MD)No.192 of 2024 09.07.2025
- [12/07, 09:20] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1943880595790041502?t=4TVOgRzwnpEuIkj8DlAj3g&s=08 [12/07, 09:20] Sekarreporter: Advocate & IP Attorney P.Sanjai Gamdhi @ Trade mark speak at saveetha law school on today
- Quashed Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
More
Recent Posts
- MR. JUSTICE C. KUMARAPPAN Writ Petition No.22169 of 2025 and Writ Miscellaneous Petition No.
- We should have ordered restoration of possession to the petitioner. Since the area encroached is land belonging to the Highways, we do not resort to restoration. We direct the Government to pay a compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- to the petitioner within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Government may recover the said compensation from the officers who are responsible for carrying out the erroneous eviction drive by taking law into their own hands without following the procedure contemplated under the Act. 10. This Contempt Petition is disposed of as above. (R.S.M., J.) (P.B.B., J.) 08.07.2025 dsa Index : No Internet : Yes Neutral Citation : No Speaking order R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and P.B.BALAJI, J. dsa Contempt Petition No.3436 of 2024 08.07.20
- Secretary to Government, Home Department, State of Tamil Nadu and the Registrar General, Madras High Court are expected to issue a comprehensive circular in this regard. With the above observations and directions, this criminal appeal stands disposed of. Internet : Yes 09.07.2025 gk Note: Mark a copy of this order to 1.The Secretary to Government, Home Department, State of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Registrar General, Madras High Court. To 1.The Inspector of Police, NIB CID, Trichy District. 2.The Judge, Additional District Court for EC and NDPS Act Cases, Pudukottai. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk Crl.A(MD)No.192 of 2024 09.07.2025
- [12/07, 09:20] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1943880595790041502?t=4TVOgRzwnpEuIkj8DlAj3g&s=08 [12/07, 09:20] Sekarreporter: Advocate & IP Attorney P.Sanjai Gamdhi @ Trade mark speak at saveetha law school on today
- Quashed Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
