Follow:
- Next story UPDATES’Do You Want To Make This Country An Open Jail’ : Justice (Retd) Chandru Speaks Against CAA-NRC
- Previous story [12/30, 16:40] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1211605395753463809?s=08 [12/30, 16:40] Sekarreporter 1: [12/30, 16:25] Karventhan Vidurhaisiruthai: The Opposition parties DMK, VCK and others filed a batch of writ petitions seeking for video coverage of counting of votes in local bodies elections through out tamilnadu and a direction to comply with rules 60 to 69 of TN Panchayat Elections Rules 1996, based on the representations sent by the opposition parties to State Election Commission. All the writ petition came up for hearing before the Honble Vacation Bench of Madras High Court today. The Opposition Parties were represented by various counsels under the lead of Senior Counsel Mr.N.R.Elango, on behalf of DMK’s party functionary Mr.R.S.Bharathi, MP, Rajya Sabha and Ms.S.Deepika, Counsel representing VCK Legal wing Secretary Mr.D.Parventhan. whereas State Election Commission was represented by Senior Counsel Mr.Ar.L.Sunderesan. it was represented by State Election Commission that when they are strictly following the chapter VI (Rules 60 to 69) of TN Panchayat Rules, there is no question of directing them by way of mandamus sought by the Petitioners. In the course of arguement and in the Counter Affidavit filed by Commission, it was informed that the Returning Officers are instructed to install CCTV Cameras in counting booths and the coverage would not be only focussing the ballot papers which was vehemently opposed by all the Petitioner Counsels and district wise malpractices and incidents were reported before the court. Quiet interestingly, the State Government And Election Commission submitted that the Writ Petitions are merely based and presumptions and apprehensions and no past history was recorded. Whereas the same was countered by Petitioner’s Counsel that their (commission) own circular admitted about the past history of malpractices and booth capturing etc., Ultimately the Election Commission conceded to the fact that they would delete the line mentioning about the ” recording would not cover ballot papers ” in their circular dated 13.12.2019. Recording their ( State Election Commission) submission that the counting process would be videographed in the presence of candidates and their agents, the Writ Petitions are disposed of. [12/30, 16:26] Sekarreporter 1: 👍
Recent Posts
- Full order motor insurence caseSuo Motu W.P. No.12935 of 2021 P.N. PRAKASH, J. and ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. In continuation of our earlier order dated 02.07.2021, we pass the following order: 2 Mr. N. Vijayaraghavan, learned Amicus Curiae, Mr. K. Seetharaman, Additional Registrar (Inspection), Mr.S.Sethuraman and Mr. M. Ilayaraja, Assistant Chief Nodal Officers are present. Further, the District Nodal Officers appointed vide our earlier order dated 18.06.2021 also participated in the hearing via Video Conferencing. State Bank of India, Pattukkottai Branch, is directed to submit their response to the report of the learned Amicus Curiae, in writing, on the next hearing date. It is open to Mr.C.Mohan to bring the officials of the bank for the next hearing for rendering necessary assistance. 17 As done in the earlier hearings, the learned Amicus Curiae has undertaken to send a copy of this order by e-mail to all the Insurance Companies and Transport Corporations and the same shall be treated as sufficient notice for compliance.
- Tax case mhc s m subramaniyam directions
- Full order THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 20-07-2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP No.28927 of 2012 And tax case judge passed direction
- Raiway masthoor union kanayn filed case in mhc regarding central govt union code system former advocate general somiya interview
- Sekarreporter: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1420291173059493890?s=08 [7/28, 13:31] Sekarreporter: [7/28, 13:19] Muthukumar Govt Counsel: Furthermore We argued that in the beginning stage itself the Writ petition to be dismissed….. [7/28, 13:19] Muthukumar Govt Counsel: Sir…appointment of.Archagar matter reached and we opposed and argued that already similar to this issue is dealt by Supreme Court in sivachariyar
More
Recent Posts
- Full order motor insurence caseSuo Motu W.P. No.12935 of 2021 P.N. PRAKASH, J. and ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. In continuation of our earlier order dated 02.07.2021, we pass the following order: 2 Mr. N. Vijayaraghavan, learned Amicus Curiae, Mr. K. Seetharaman, Additional Registrar (Inspection), Mr.S.Sethuraman and Mr. M. Ilayaraja, Assistant Chief Nodal Officers are present. Further, the District Nodal Officers appointed vide our earlier order dated 18.06.2021 also participated in the hearing via Video Conferencing. State Bank of India, Pattukkottai Branch, is directed to submit their response to the report of the learned Amicus Curiae, in writing, on the next hearing date. It is open to Mr.C.Mohan to bring the officials of the bank for the next hearing for rendering necessary assistance. 17 As done in the earlier hearings, the learned Amicus Curiae has undertaken to send a copy of this order by e-mail to all the Insurance Companies and Transport Corporations and the same shall be treated as sufficient notice for compliance.
- Tax case mhc s m subramaniyam directions
- Full order THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 20-07-2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP No.28927 of 2012 And tax case judge passed direction
- Raiway masthoor union kanayn filed case in mhc regarding central govt union code system former advocate general somiya interview
- Sekarreporter: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1420291173059493890?s=08 [7/28, 13:31] Sekarreporter: [7/28, 13:19] Muthukumar Govt Counsel: Furthermore We argued that in the beginning stage itself the Writ petition to be dismissed….. [7/28, 13:19] Muthukumar Govt Counsel: Sir…appointment of.Archagar matter reached and we opposed and argued that already similar to this issue is dealt by Supreme Court in sivachariyar
