You may also like...
-
Judge jegathese chandra In fine, as far as the petitions seeking the summoning of witnesses are concerned, this Court finds that the evidence of Secretary (Telecom), Rakesh Kumar Somani, AGM (Vigilance) and Sathyamurthy, then Inspector of Police, CBI, appears to be relevant and necessary for the just decision of the case. In such perspective of the matter, the Trial Court ought to have exercised the power under Section 348, BNSS, and examined the said individuals as Court witnesses.
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 26, 2026
-
Ragavachari: Were there any restrictions on all these things? Court adds, in a lighter vein: Everytime some important leader comes to airport, what happens [11/7, 18:04] Sekarreporter 1: Advocate Raghavachari: We’ll not exceed 100 people when going to temples
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 7, 2020
-
In view of the aforesaid legal position, we expunge the general observations made by the learned Single Judge of this Court in paragraph no.8 of the order dated 31.01.2022 in Cont.P.No.1330 of 2021 in Crl.R.C.No.112 of 2021, which we have extracted in paragraph no.8 (supra). This contempt appeal is ordered The Honourable Mr. Justice P.N.PRAKASH and The Honourable Mr. Justice A.A.NAKKIRAN Cont.A.No.1 of 2022 1.The Director General of Police and Head of Police Force, Tamil Nadu, Chennai திரு.ஹசன் முகமது ஜின்னா மாநில அரசு வக்கீல் திரு.ஆர்.முனியப்பராஜ் கூடுதல் அரசு வக்கீல் மற்றும் திரு.என்.எஸ்.சுகாந்தன் அரசு வழக்கறிஞர் (Crl.பக்கம்) .
by Sekar Reporter · Published April 28, 2022