Fridar 2nd january mhc list

You may also like...

• 

  கவிஞர் லீனா மணிமேகலைக்கு எதிராக இயக்குனர் சுசி கணேசன் தொடர்ந்த வழக்கில் இருந்து டிவிட்டர் நிறுவனத்தை நீக்க சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் மறுத்துவிட்டது.

  March 18, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published March 18, 2022

• 

  5.Public money has been wasted due to adamant behaviour not only of the officer who terminated the services but also due to cantankerous attitude adopted by those responsible for pursuing the litigation before the one or the other authority. They have literally persecuted her. Despite unequal strength the opposite party has managed to survive. We are informed that the opposite party has been reinstated. This was put forward as bonafide conduct of petitioner to persuade us to modify the order in respect of back wages. Facts speak otherwise. Working life of opposite party has been lost in this tortuous and painful litigation of more than twenty years. For such thoughtless acts of its officers the petitioner-society has to suffer and pay an amount exceeding three lakhs is indeed pitiable. But considering the agony and suffering of the opposite party that amount cannot be a proper recompense. We, therefore, dismiss this petition as devoid of any merit and direct the petitioner to comply with the directions of the High Court within the time granted by it. We however leave it open to the society to replenish itself and recover the amount of back wages paid by it to the opposite party from the personal salary of the officers of the society who have been responsible for this endless litigation including the officer who was responsible for terminating the services of the opposite patty. We may clarify that the permission given, shall have nothing to do with the direction to pay the respondent her back wages. Step if any to recover the amount shall be taken only after payment is made to the opposite party as directed by the High Court…. ” No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. (S.V.N., J.)    (M.S.Q., J.)                                                                                                       12.01.2023 Speaking order/Non-speaking order Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No ar                               S.VAIDYANATHAN, J. and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. ar PRE-DELIVERY JUDGMENT IN W.A.No.1692 of 2022   12.01.2023

  January 14, 2023

   by Sekar Reporter · Published January 14, 2023

• 

  வீரப்பன்தேடுதல் வேட்டை இழப்பீடு No. Chief justice

  November 4, 2025

   by Sekar Reporter · Published November 4, 2025