Follow:
- Next story N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. Pursuant to the earlier orders passed by this Court on 29.03.2021, the matter has been placed before this Court as “specially ordered case”, after obtaining appropriate orders from the Hon’ble Chief Justice. 2.The petitioners as well as their respective parents were directed to attend counselling before Ms.Vidhya Dinakaran, Counselling Psychologist. On the request made by this Court, the Psychotherapist also readily accepted to counsel the parties.
- Previous story “I am not fully ‘woke’ on this aspect:” Madras High Court Judge fixes appointment with psychologist to understand same-sex relationships better “I honestly feel that such a session with a professional will help me understand same-sex relationships better and will pave way for my evolution,” the Judge said in his order. “I am not fully ‘woke’ on this aspect:” Madras High Court Judge fixes appointment with psychologist to understand same-sex relationships better Justice Anand Venkatesh, Madras High Court
Recent Posts
- Order setaside HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.(MD)Nos.3011 of 2026 and 31834 of 2025 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.25026, 25029 and 27598 of 2025 In W.P.(MD).No.3011 of 2026 :- S.Lilavathi .. Petitioner Versus 1. The Sub-Registrar, Papanasam – 614 205.
- 02/06, 11:27] Vinothpandian: 2018 (4) crimes SC 232 : Reema Salkan vs sumer Singh Salkan : A well qualified and able bodied man cannot be absolved of his liability to maintain his wife merely on a plea of not possessing any source of income [02/06, 11:27] Vinothpandian: 2015 (2) crimes SC 169 : Ghusabhai Raisanghai chorasiya vs state of gujarat : Allegation of illicit
- [02/06, 12:47] sekarreporter1: 👍👍 [02/06, 12:47] sekarreporter1: The appeals preferred by the two investors against the order of the learned Single Judge, which had paved the way for the release of actor Chiyaan Vikram starrer Dhruva Natchathiram or before 15.06.2026, were extensively argued over a period of two days. Senior Counsels Mr. S.R. Rajagopal and Mr. S.R. Sundar appeared for the Appellants, while Senior Counsels Mr. T.R. Rajagopal and Mr. Abdul Hameed represented the Respondents. Earlier on 21.05.2026, pending further consideration of the matter, the Hon’ble Division Bench was pleased to direct the learned Advocate Commissioners not to disburse the sum of Rs.10.62 crores without obtaining the leave of the Court , the Hon’ble Mr. Justice P. Velmurugan and Hon’ble Mr. Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi of the Madras High Court reserved orders in the appeals.
- Aag Notification No.02/2026 Dated: 01.06.2026 Government of Tamil Nadu Home (Courts-IV) Department 1. Applications are invited under Rule 5(3) of the Law Officers of High Court of Madras and its Bench at Madurai (Appointment) Rules, 2017 from the eligible Advocates / candidates in the prescribed format for the post and vacancy specified below (as applicable):-
- [02/06, 12:08] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxUBbW1B6o7P2nzedhpWyFENHSDk2R1ibq?si=dKC18OhAV24gMf62 [02/06, 12:08] sekarreporter1: *Here is why petition in Madras High Court for FIR against CM Vijay was withdrawn* The plea also sought registration of an FIR for cheating, forgery, use of forged documents and criminal conspiracy. https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/here-is-why-petition-in-madras-high-court-for-fir-against-cm-vijay-was-withdrawn
More
Recent Posts
- Order setaside HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.(MD)Nos.3011 of 2026 and 31834 of 2025 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.25026, 25029 and 27598 of 2025 In W.P.(MD).No.3011 of 2026 :- S.Lilavathi .. Petitioner Versus 1. The Sub-Registrar, Papanasam – 614 205.
- 02/06, 11:27] Vinothpandian: 2018 (4) crimes SC 232 : Reema Salkan vs sumer Singh Salkan : A well qualified and able bodied man cannot be absolved of his liability to maintain his wife merely on a plea of not possessing any source of income [02/06, 11:27] Vinothpandian: 2015 (2) crimes SC 169 : Ghusabhai Raisanghai chorasiya vs state of gujarat : Allegation of illicit
- [02/06, 12:47] sekarreporter1: 👍👍 [02/06, 12:47] sekarreporter1: The appeals preferred by the two investors against the order of the learned Single Judge, which had paved the way for the release of actor Chiyaan Vikram starrer Dhruva Natchathiram or before 15.06.2026, were extensively argued over a period of two days. Senior Counsels Mr. S.R. Rajagopal and Mr. S.R. Sundar appeared for the Appellants, while Senior Counsels Mr. T.R. Rajagopal and Mr. Abdul Hameed represented the Respondents. Earlier on 21.05.2026, pending further consideration of the matter, the Hon’ble Division Bench was pleased to direct the learned Advocate Commissioners not to disburse the sum of Rs.10.62 crores without obtaining the leave of the Court , the Hon’ble Mr. Justice P. Velmurugan and Hon’ble Mr. Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi of the Madras High Court reserved orders in the appeals.
- Aag Notification No.02/2026 Dated: 01.06.2026 Government of Tamil Nadu Home (Courts-IV) Department 1. Applications are invited under Rule 5(3) of the Law Officers of High Court of Madras and its Bench at Madurai (Appointment) Rules, 2017 from the eligible Advocates / candidates in the prescribed format for the post and vacancy specified below (as applicable):-
- [02/06, 12:08] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxUBbW1B6o7P2nzedhpWyFENHSDk2R1ibq?si=dKC18OhAV24gMf62 [02/06, 12:08] sekarreporter1: *Here is why petition in Madras High Court for FIR against CM Vijay was withdrawn* The plea also sought registration of an FIR for cheating, forgery, use of forged documents and criminal conspiracy. https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/here-is-why-petition-in-madras-high-court-for-fir-against-cm-vijay-was-withdrawn