Skip to content

Search for:

Home
Gallery
Contact Us

Court News from Madras High Court

Home
Gallery
Contact Us

Uncategorized

For esi senior advt s Ravinthiren argued

by Sekar Reporter · July 29, 2020

[7/29, 11:56] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1288360122142490624?s=08
[7/29, 11:56] Sekarreporter 1: [7/29, 11:30] Sekarreporter 1: Full bench judgement today on applicability of ESI act to educational institutions
[7/29, 11:30] Sekarreporter 1: ESI Act notification application to educational institutions upheld by Full Bench
[7/29, 11:30] Sekarreporter 1: ESI Act notification application to educational institutions upheld by Full Bench
[7/29, 11:30] Sekarreporter 1: For esi senior advt s Ravinthiren argued

You may also like...

K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: Accredition of journalists was used as a bait(carrot)to lure themcto sing paens for the ruling govt.Those who are critical denied benefits such as housing,foreign tours etc.News papers who are critical denied govt adds

January 12, 2020

by Sekar Reporter · Published January 12, 2020
[1/27, 19:30] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/N8bJZpm_l5o [1/27, 19:33] Sekarreporter 1: [1/27, 19:32] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1486701151357599744?t=msgyXDMGr_ld95oGN3MpVQ&s=08 [1/27, 19:32] Sekarreporter 1: Congrats mam

January 27, 2022

by Sekar Reporter · Published January 27, 2022
Here’s all you need to know about the Madras High Court order on GST to be paid by RWAs

August 8, 2021

by Sekar Reporter · Published August 8, 2021

Follow:

Next story [7/29, 11:54] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1288359626790940674?s=08 [7/29, 11:54] Sekarreporter 1: [7/29, 11:45] Vivek mhc Dmk: உண்மைக்கு புறம்பான தகவல்களை வெளியீடு செய்த YouTube channel மதன் ரவிச்சந்திரன் மீது தி மு கா வின் இளைஞர் அணி செயலளர் திரு உதயநிதி ஸ்டாலின் அவதூறு வழக்கு தொடர்ந்தார்…. [7/29, 11:45] Vivek mhc advt Dmk: Criminal complaint
Previous story Chandrasekar Mhc Advt: CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY inviting you to a lecture on DISTRICT JUDGE EXAMINATION – 2020 Subject : The Indian registration act 1908 BY: R. CHANDRASEKARAN ADVOCATE Date: 29th July 2020

Search for:

Recent Posts

Today 6 law tips / [20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2015 (6) SCC 287 : Priyanka srivastava vs state of UP : when a borrower of financial institution covered under the SARFASI act , invokes jurisdiction under sec 156 (3) CRPC and also there is a separate procedure under Recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act , an attitude of more care , caution and circumspection has to be adhered to[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: Supreme court judgement: SLP ( civil ) No 9496 of 2020 dated 4- 02 – 2022 Ajanta LLP vs casino keisanki kabushiki computer ltd : consent decree cannot be modified / altered unless the mistake is patent or obvious mistake ( order 23 rule 3 CPC 1908 )[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) SCC 39 ; Joseph shine vs union.of india : A bench disagreeing with decision.of a larger or coequal bench can only refer the matter to a larger bench , it cannot disagree or dissent[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: Supreme court: civil.appeal no 363 of 2022 dated 10- 02 – 2022 Bank of baroda vs M / S karwa trading company and another : In a SARFASI proceedings , unless and until borrower ready to deposit / pay entire amount payable together with all costs and expenses with secured creditor , borrower cannot be discharged from entire liability outstanding[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 830 : saradhammal vs sankaralingam : Held transfer of immovable property under attachment with knowledge of attachment vitiates transfer ( sec 52 transfer of property act 1882 )[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2011 (7) SCC 69 : Amar singh vs union of india : Held litigants must observe total clarity and candour in their pleadings especially when it contains a prayer for injunction ( order 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC 1908 )
[20/04, 11:34] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1781564360177209576?t=ijXt2lW-UwiEB44RJHBZCg&s=08[20/04, 11:34] sekarreporter1: K Parasaran book Launch function vadapalani chennai today evening 5.30 thanjai sastra college chennai campus
Juniors of Senior Govindaswinathan award function[20/04, 11:15] sekarreporter1: Juniors of late Senior adv Govindaswinathan award function held Sunday naradaganasaba 10.30 morning
PLAINT LIFELINE OF LITIGATION
DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE SECOND APPEAL UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC IS MAINTAINABLE FROM THE APPELLAT’S COURT DECREE OF REVERSING THE REJECTION OF PLAINT DECREE:-

More

Recent Posts

Today 6 law tips / [20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2015 (6) SCC 287 : Priyanka srivastava vs state of UP : when a borrower of financial institution covered under the SARFASI act , invokes jurisdiction under sec 156 (3) CRPC and also there is a separate procedure under Recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act , an attitude of more care , caution and circumspection has to be adhered to[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: Supreme court judgement: SLP ( civil ) No 9496 of 2020 dated 4- 02 – 2022 Ajanta LLP vs casino keisanki kabushiki computer ltd : consent decree cannot be modified / altered unless the mistake is patent or obvious mistake ( order 23 rule 3 CPC 1908 )[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) SCC 39 ; Joseph shine vs union.of india : A bench disagreeing with decision.of a larger or coequal bench can only refer the matter to a larger bench , it cannot disagree or dissent[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: Supreme court: civil.appeal no 363 of 2022 dated 10- 02 – 2022 Bank of baroda vs M / S karwa trading company and another : In a SARFASI proceedings , unless and until borrower ready to deposit / pay entire amount payable together with all costs and expenses with secured creditor , borrower cannot be discharged from entire liability outstanding[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 830 : saradhammal vs sankaralingam : Held transfer of immovable property under attachment with knowledge of attachment vitiates transfer ( sec 52 transfer of property act 1882 )[20/04, 11:16] Vinothpandian: 2011 (7) SCC 69 : Amar singh vs union of india : Held litigants must observe total clarity and candour in their pleadings especially when it contains a prayer for injunction ( order 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC 1908 )
[20/04, 11:34] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1781564360177209576?t=ijXt2lW-UwiEB44RJHBZCg&s=08[20/04, 11:34] sekarreporter1: K Parasaran book Launch function vadapalani chennai today evening 5.30 thanjai sastra college chennai campus
Juniors of Senior Govindaswinathan award function[20/04, 11:15] sekarreporter1: Juniors of late Senior adv Govindaswinathan award function held Sunday naradaganasaba 10.30 morning
PLAINT LIFELINE OF LITIGATION
DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE SECOND APPEAL UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC IS MAINTAINABLE FROM THE APPELLAT’S COURT DECREE OF REVERSING THE REJECTION OF PLAINT DECREE:-

SEKAR REPORTER © 2024. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by - Designed with the Hueman theme