You may also like...
-
Collegium recommendations should not be vetoed by the govt: Justice Deepak Gupta
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 10, 2020
-
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM C.M.A.No.1121 of 2016—–With reference to the filing of the appeal by the workmen, this Court is of the considered opinion that the employer shifted his liability. The case on hand is a classic case where the employer has not taken care regarding the rights of the workmen. The Insurance Company is also attempting to restrict its liability. Ultimately, the very purpose and object of the Workmen Compensation Act is defeated. Therefore, this Court is of the opinion that in the event of employer or the Insurance Company shifting its responsibility, the Courts are expected to act swiftly and pay “just compensation” immediately and liberty may be granted to the Insurance Company concerned to initiate action against the employer for recovery in accordance with law.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 22, 2021
-
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Appeal Suit No.175 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013. For Appellants : Mr.V.Raghavachari For Respondents : Mr.N.Subbarayalu JUDGMENT The Result: 28.The Appeal Suit in A.S.No.175 of 2013 is allowed; The Judgement and Decree dated 01.03.2013, in O.S.No.14807 of 2010, on the file of the XIX-Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, is set aside; The O.S.No.14807 of 2010, on the file of the XIX-Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, stands decreed as prayed for; The appellants/ plaintiffs are entitled for the costs; Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 12.10.2022
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 13, 2022