Dj order age limit IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06.02.2020 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.A.P.SAHI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD read full order

[2/7, 10:20] Sekarreporter: [2/7, 10:01] vijai Advt Mba: First Bench of Madras High Court upheld the constitutionality of cadre rule prescribing maximum age limit of 45 years for the post of District Judge( Entry level) for unreserved categories. Bench held that maximum age limit cannot be relaxed by High Court in absence of express provision.
[2/7, 10:20] Sekarreporter: 🌹
[2/7, 10:21] Sekarreporter: W.P.Nos.95, 544 of 2020, 35849, 35906 of 2019, W.P.(MD) No.201 of 2020
and W.P.SR No.158006 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.02.2020
CORAM :
THE HON’BLE MR.A.P.SAHI, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
W.P.Nos.95, 544 of 2020, 35849, 35906 of 2019, W.P.(MD) No.201 of
2020 and W.P.SR No.158006 of 2019
and
W.M.P.Nos.111, 639, 640, 641 of 2010; 36668, 36754 and 36821 of
2019
W.P.No.95 of 2020:
N.S.Sivakumar .. Petitioner
-vs-
The Additional Chief Secretary
to the Government of Tamil Nadu,
Secretariat,
Fort St. George,
Chennai – 600 009.
The Principal Secretary to Government (FAC),
Public (Special.A) Department,
Fort St. George,
Chennai – 600 009.

Page 1 of 46
http://www.judis.nic.in
[2/7, 10:22] Sekarreporter: W.P.Nos.95, 544 of 2020, 35849, 35906 of 2019, W.P.(MD) No.201 of 2020
and W.P.SR No.158006 of 2019
The Registrar General,
High Court Madras,
Chennai – 600 104. .. Respondents
and batch cases
For Petitioner
in W.P.No.95/2020
: Mr.Om Prakash
Senior Counsel
for Mr.V.Vasanthakumar
For Petitioner
in W.P.No.35849/2019
: Mr.V.Arun
For Petitioner
in W.P.No.35906/2019
: Mr.M.Muthappan
For Petitioner in
W.P.No.544 of 2020
: Mr.K.Ravi Anantha
Padmanaban
For Petitioner in
W.P.(MD) No.201/2020
: Mr.Muthappan
for M/s.V.Lakshmanan
For Petitioner in
W.P.No.SR
158006/2019
: Mr.R.Sankarasubbu
For Respondents : Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan
State Government Pleader
for respondent Nos.1 and 2
in W.P.No.95/2020;

Page 2 of 46
http://www.judis.nic.in
[2/7, 10:22] Sekarreporter: W.P.Nos.95, 544 of 2020, 35849, 35906 of 2019, W.P.(MD) No.201 of 2020
and W.P.SR No.158006 of 2019
Respondent No.2 in
W.P.Nos.35849/2019;
W.P.(MD) No.201/2020 and
W.P.No. SR 158006/2019
Respondent No.1 in
W.P.Nos.35906/2019 and
544/2020
: Mr.B.Vijay
for respondent No.3 in
W.P.No.95/2020;
Respondent No.2 in
W.P.Nos.35849, 35906/2019;
544/2020
Respondent No.1
in W.P.(MD) No.201/2020
Respondent Nos.1 and 3
in W.P.No. SR 158006/2019
COMMON ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by The Hon’ble Chief Justice)
The petitioners in all the writ petitions are candidates of the
Backward Class Category claiming relaxation in age at par with the
candidates of Schedule Castes and Schedule Tribes, which stands at
48 years, on the ground that they also belong to the reserved

Page 3 of 46
http://www.judis.nic.in

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Call Now ButtonCALL ME