Follow:
- Next story Adhilashmi Logomoorthy: Legal Eagles Elites is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting. Topic: The Tamil Nadu Gaming Act, 1930 Resource Person: V. Sudha, Advocate, Coimbatore Date: 25-2-2021 (Thursday) Time: 6:00 PM IST Onwards
- Previous story Smsj full order THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM C.M.S.A.No.27 of 2020 -++-The only question of law raised in the present second appeal is that whether the complaint/application filed by the respondent before the Regulatory Authority is maintainable or not. In view of the fact that the completion certificate issued by the Executive Officer, Town Panchayat is not in consonance either with the provisions of the Town and Country Planning Act as well as the building plan approval sanctioned by the Director of Town and Country Planning or in accordance with the provision of the RERA Act, the same cannot be construed as a valid certificate for the purpose of grant of exclusion under Section 3(2)(b) of the RERA Act. The certificate is to be construed as insignificant and irrelevant as far as the RERA Act is concerned and for all purposes, the building is to be treated as on-going project. Therefore, the appellants/builders are bound to comply with the terms and conditions in the project as well as comply with the provisions of various laws governing real estate affairs. Accordingly, this Court has no hesitation in arriving a conclusion that the application/complaint filed by the respondents/apartment owners association is maintainable under the provisions of the RERA Act, 2016 and accordingly, the order passed by the Appellate Tribunal stands confirmed and consequently, Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal stands dismissed. No costs. The Regulatory Authority is directed to entertain the application/complaint filed by the respondents/apartment owners association and adjudicate the issues on merits and in accordance with law by affording opportunity to all the parties concerned and accordingly, pass speaking final orders within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Recent Posts
- MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR A.S.No.586 of 2025 and CMP.No.10580 of 2025 Prema … Appellant
- நீதிபதி திரு சத்யநாராயண பிரசாத் அவர்கள் முன்னிலையில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்தது. மனுதாரர் மற்றும் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் துரைசாமியின் சார்பில், வழக்கறிஞர் வி. இளங்கோவன் ஆஜரானார். அரசு
- Case quashed against Big boss darsan advocate Thenmoli
- JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR Criminal Appeal Nos.1128 of 2022 and 255 of 2023 and Crl. M.P. No.19507 of 2023 Sanjana … Appellant in Crl.A. No.1128/2022/A2 Balaji … Appellant in Crl.A. No.255/2023/A1 Vs. State represented by Inspector of Police, W-25, All Women Police Station, T. Nagar, Chennai. (Crime No.6/2019) .. Respondent in both the appeals
- THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.A.No.1664 of 2023 and Crl.M.P.No.20268 of 2023 — State Represented by The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Sooramangalam Range, Karuppur Police Station, Salem City,
More
Recent Posts
- MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR A.S.No.586 of 2025 and CMP.No.10580 of 2025 Prema … Appellant
- நீதிபதி திரு சத்யநாராயண பிரசாத் அவர்கள் முன்னிலையில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்தது. மனுதாரர் மற்றும் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் துரைசாமியின் சார்பில், வழக்கறிஞர் வி. இளங்கோவன் ஆஜரானார். அரசு
- Case quashed against Big boss darsan advocate Thenmoli
- JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR Criminal Appeal Nos.1128 of 2022 and 255 of 2023 and Crl. M.P. No.19507 of 2023 Sanjana … Appellant in Crl.A. No.1128/2022/A2 Balaji … Appellant in Crl.A. No.255/2023/A1 Vs. State represented by Inspector of Police, W-25, All Women Police Station, T. Nagar, Chennai. (Crime No.6/2019) .. Respondent in both the appeals
- THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.A.No.1664 of 2023 and Crl.M.P.No.20268 of 2023 — State Represented by The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Sooramangalam Range, Karuppur Police Station, Salem City,
