Follow:
- Next story The Supreme Court on Friday (Sep.19) appointed former Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud to act as a mediator in a dispute between two companies over ownership of 170,000 MT of iron ore in Sihora, Jabalpur. A bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and KV Viswanathan passed an order
- Previous story Chief justice Of sc excellant speech today
Recent Posts
- STATEMENT The Supreme Court Collegium in its meeting held on 18 th May, 2026 has approved the following proposals for appointment of below-named persons as Judges in the Madras High Court: Proposal dated 04th November, 2025 (i) Dr. P. Murugan, (ii) Mrs. M. D. Sumathi, (iii) Mrs. S. Alli, (iv) Mrs. C. Thirumagal Chandrasekar, (v) Shri Dharmalingam Lingeswaran, and (vi) Shri Karthikeyan Balathandayutham. Proposal dated 21st November, 2025 (i) Shri Natarajan Ramesh, (ii) Shri G.K. Muthukumaar, (iii) Shri Ramakrishnan Rajesh Vivekananthan, (iv) Shri Sankaranarayanan Raveekumar, (v) Shri Nagarajan Dilip Kumar, and (vi) Shri Ellappan Manoharan, Proposal dated 07th December, 2025 (i) Shri Krishnaswamy Govindarajan, (ii) Shri Rajnish Pathiyil, (iii) Shri K. Appadurai @ Kandavel Appadurai, and (iv) Mrs. Ramasamy Anitha Proposal dated 10th December, 2025 (i) Shri Shanmugam Karthikeyan, (ii) Shri Baluchamy Murugesan, and (iii) Shri N. Gunasekaran. ==============
- [19/05, 11:25] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2056614548547989656 [19/05, 11:25] sekarreporter1: *Senior Congress Leader & VOT President C.Rajashekaran,Advocate congratulated & greeted State PP Sr.Advocate.John Sathyan in laters office on 18/5/26.*
- Breaking மருத்துவர் சுப்பையா வழக்கில் கைது செய்யப்பட்ட குற்றவாளிகளை விடுதலை செய்த சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற உத்தரவை ரத்து செய்தது உச்சநீதிமன்றம் அனைவருக்கும் ஆயுள் தண்டனை வழங்கி உத்தரவு விசாரணை நீதிமன்றம் வழங்கிய தண்டனையை சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் ரத்து செய்தது மிகப்பெரிய தவறு எனவும் உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் தீர்ப்பு வழங்கியுள்ளது
- Justice P Velmurugan and Justice K Govindarajan Thilakavadi observed, “While the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 governs
- The power to block or remove online content is a serious power. It may affect not only the author of the content but also the public’s right to receive information. In the digital age, blocking a URL may silence a speaker, erase a viewpoint and impoverish public debate. Therefore, such power must be exercised with precision, restraint and reasons,” the court added.
More
Recent Posts
- STATEMENT The Supreme Court Collegium in its meeting held on 18 th May, 2026 has approved the following proposals for appointment of below-named persons as Judges in the Madras High Court: Proposal dated 04th November, 2025 (i) Dr. P. Murugan, (ii) Mrs. M. D. Sumathi, (iii) Mrs. S. Alli, (iv) Mrs. C. Thirumagal Chandrasekar, (v) Shri Dharmalingam Lingeswaran, and (vi) Shri Karthikeyan Balathandayutham. Proposal dated 21st November, 2025 (i) Shri Natarajan Ramesh, (ii) Shri G.K. Muthukumaar, (iii) Shri Ramakrishnan Rajesh Vivekananthan, (iv) Shri Sankaranarayanan Raveekumar, (v) Shri Nagarajan Dilip Kumar, and (vi) Shri Ellappan Manoharan, Proposal dated 07th December, 2025 (i) Shri Krishnaswamy Govindarajan, (ii) Shri Rajnish Pathiyil, (iii) Shri K. Appadurai @ Kandavel Appadurai, and (iv) Mrs. Ramasamy Anitha Proposal dated 10th December, 2025 (i) Shri Shanmugam Karthikeyan, (ii) Shri Baluchamy Murugesan, and (iii) Shri N. Gunasekaran. ==============
- [19/05, 11:25] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2056614548547989656 [19/05, 11:25] sekarreporter1: *Senior Congress Leader & VOT President C.Rajashekaran,Advocate congratulated & greeted State PP Sr.Advocate.John Sathyan in laters office on 18/5/26.*
- Breaking மருத்துவர் சுப்பையா வழக்கில் கைது செய்யப்பட்ட குற்றவாளிகளை விடுதலை செய்த சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற உத்தரவை ரத்து செய்தது உச்சநீதிமன்றம் அனைவருக்கும் ஆயுள் தண்டனை வழங்கி உத்தரவு விசாரணை நீதிமன்றம் வழங்கிய தண்டனையை சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் ரத்து செய்தது மிகப்பெரிய தவறு எனவும் உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் தீர்ப்பு வழங்கியுள்ளது
- Justice P Velmurugan and Justice K Govindarajan Thilakavadi observed, “While the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 governs
- The power to block or remove online content is a serious power. It may affect not only the author of the content but also the public’s right to receive information. In the digital age, blocking a URL may silence a speaker, erase a viewpoint and impoverish public debate. Therefore, such power must be exercised with precision, restraint and reasons,” the court added.