Follow:
- Next story [1/8, 14:48] Sekarreporter: A Bench headed by Chief Justice S.A. Bobde accepted the CBI’s status report and allowed two officers to be relieved from the investigation team The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Wednesday told the Supreme Court that there was no evidence of the murder of children in the Muzaffarpur shelter home. The probe agency told the apex court that two skeletons were recovered, but forensic investigation later revealed it to be that of a woman and a man. [1/8, 14:48] Sekarreporter: A Bench headed by Chief Justice S.A. Bobde accepted the CBI’s status report and allowed two officers to be relieved from the investigation team. Attorney General K.K. Venugopal, appearing for the probe agency, said an investigation was done on the rape and sexual assault allegation of children and charge sheets had been filed before the concerned courts. Mr. Venugopal said the children, who were alleged to be murdered, were later traced and found to be alive. He said the CBI had investigated 17 shelter homes in Bihar and charge sheets had been filed in 13 of them. In four cases, a preliminary inquiry was conducted and later closed as no evidence was found.
- Previous story Madras high court moved to set up museum to display artefacts excavated from Alagankulam https://t.co/kkzKUZX3de via @timesofindia
Recent Posts
- [23/07, 08:29] sekarreporter1: [23/07, 08:29] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2080125530113007868 [23/07, 08:29] sekarreporter1: வாக்கு எண்ணிக்கை நடத்திக் கொடுத்தவர்களுக்கு பார் கவுன்சிலிங் நேற்று பாராட்டு விழா நடந்தது [23/07, 08:29] sekarreporter1: 👍🌹🌹🌹
- No useful purpose will be served by conducting a trial against the petitioner and further continuation of the investigation as against this petitioner and making the petitioner to face the case would also turn out oppressive
- No. 515 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on : 23-03-2026 :::: Pronounced on : 05-06-2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU AS No. 515 of 2016 and CMP Nos. 17009, 12188 & 18867 of 2016 G.Vijaya A.Maharani Vs ..Appellant(s) ..Respondent(s) Prayer : This Appeal Suit filed to set aside the judgment and decree dated 29.04.2016 made in O.S. No. 2 of 2014 on the file of III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Cuddalore at Vridhachalam. For Appellant(s): For Respondent(s): Mr.K.R.Gunashekar Ms.V.Srimathi J U D G M E N T The present Appeal suit has been filed seeking to set aside
- http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx63aFObGRC67Nn44KSaIDtTld3rpEwz8g?si=12DuBF448yqPMtTa [23/07, 07:34] sekarreporter1: The Supreme Court has clarified that a computer-related offence punishable under Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 is a bailable offence.
- http://youtube.com/post/UgkxK2_x-LLrJW5hL2RN4ogerOv5xtmCyYxe?si=CUV8uSLwt1i6Jhb5 [22/07, 20:55] sekarreporter1:
More
Recent Posts
- [23/07, 08:29] sekarreporter1: [23/07, 08:29] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2080125530113007868 [23/07, 08:29] sekarreporter1: வாக்கு எண்ணிக்கை நடத்திக் கொடுத்தவர்களுக்கு பார் கவுன்சிலிங் நேற்று பாராட்டு விழா நடந்தது [23/07, 08:29] sekarreporter1: 👍🌹🌹🌹
- No useful purpose will be served by conducting a trial against the petitioner and further continuation of the investigation as against this petitioner and making the petitioner to face the case would also turn out oppressive
- No. 515 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on : 23-03-2026 :::: Pronounced on : 05-06-2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU AS No. 515 of 2016 and CMP Nos. 17009, 12188 & 18867 of 2016 G.Vijaya A.Maharani Vs ..Appellant(s) ..Respondent(s) Prayer : This Appeal Suit filed to set aside the judgment and decree dated 29.04.2016 made in O.S. No. 2 of 2014 on the file of III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Cuddalore at Vridhachalam. For Appellant(s): For Respondent(s): Mr.K.R.Gunashekar Ms.V.Srimathi J U D G M E N T The present Appeal suit has been filed seeking to set aside
- http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx63aFObGRC67Nn44KSaIDtTld3rpEwz8g?si=12DuBF448yqPMtTa [23/07, 07:34] sekarreporter1: The Supreme Court has clarified that a computer-related offence punishable under Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 is a bailable offence.
- http://youtube.com/post/UgkxK2_x-LLrJW5hL2RN4ogerOv5xtmCyYxe?si=CUV8uSLwt1i6Jhb5 [22/07, 20:55] sekarreporter1: