. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: The case cited by Litta(1990(1)L.W.335 was over ruled by DB headed by justice P.S.Misra.I argued for appelants. [7/1, 17:11] sekarreporter 9445430817: 🌹 [7/1, 17:15] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: Sorry it was the case of P.Murugan vs State.

[7/1, 16:51] sekarreporter 9445430817: [7/1, 16:50] sekarreporter 9445430817: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1278287393687101440?s=08
[7/1, 16:50] sekarreporter 9445430817: [7/1, 16:48] Lita Srinivasan: There is no office of CBI in Tuticorin or Tirunelveli . Only in madurai . No Spl PP to appear in bail or AB which is likely to follow
[7/1, 16:49] sekarreporter 9445430817: 🙏🏾
[7/1, 17:21] sekarreporter 9445430817: [7/1, 17:12] sekarreporter 9445430817: [7/1, 17:11] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: The case cited by Litta(1990(1)L.W.335 was over ruled by DB headed by justice P.S.Misra.I argued for appelants.
[7/1, 17:11] sekarreporter 9445430817: 🌹
[7/1, 17:15] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: Sorry it was the case of P.Murugan vs State.
[7/1, 17:21] sekarreporter 9445430817: [7/1, 17:10] Lita Srinivasan: maintainability of the GO transferring the case to CBI .. requesting the government to rescind the order ..

It has been held in the case of Saroja Vs State of TN and 6 others by JKJ and reported in 1990 LW (crl) 335 ..

That an offence under section 302 IPC is not a notified offence under section 3 of Delhi Special Police Establishment Act , 1946 and hence the request for seeking investigation by CBI is a misapprehension

And there are other good reasoning for not transferring a case of Section 302 IPC to CBI in para 3 of the aforesaid judgement as the local police are the competent ones .
Even if it’s notified now , the rest of the reasons in the judgement reported in 1990 LW( Crl) 335 and the reasons given in para 9 of the orders passed in WP ( MD) 7042 /20 on 30/6/2020 may be taken into consideration for rescinding the orders transferring the case to CBI. There is no office of CBI in Tuticorin or Tirunelveli . Only in madurai . No Spl PP to appear in bail or AB which is likely to follow
In the interests of justice to ensure a quick remedy
[7/1, 17:10] sekarreporter 9445430817: 🌹🙏🏾
[7/1, 17:21] sekarreporter 9445430817: [7/1, 17:18] Lita Srinivasan: Sir .. I don’t think the DB has set aside the judgement .. though law has travelled much ..

even in that judgement it says for special reasons .. as per circular in para 3.

The rest of the reasoning and para 9 of the judgement rendered yesterday should suffice for rescinding the order of transfer
[7/1, 17:19] sekarreporter 9445430817: 🙏🏾