SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Category: Uncategorized

State of Manipur is under ventilator. Please bring it to the normalcy by restoring democracy through elections and do justice to the people of that State. How long will the State Assembly will be under suspension and Parliament will usurp the role of State chair

Uncategorized

State of Manipur is under ventilator. Please bring it to the normalcy by restoring democracy through elections and do justice to the people of that State. How long will the State Assembly will be under suspension and Parliament will usurp the role of State chair

Mp wilson thank you, Hon’ble Chairman sir. State of Manipur is under ventilator. Please bring it to the normalcy by restoring democracy through elections and do justice to the people of that State. How...

Uncategorized

*Madras High Court* – *Judges:* Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G. Arul Murugan – *Case:* K. Vasudevan vs State of Tamil Nadu – *Date of Order:* December 3, 2025 – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: Mr. K. Selvaraj – Respondent: Not specified – *Court Observation:* The court questioned the Tamil Nadu government on why bus stops are being constructed on national highways without permission. The court expressed concern that such unauthorized constructions can lead to traffic congestion and accidents. The judges directed the state government to take action to prevent such constructions and file a response in the matter. *Key Points:* – The petitioner, a councilor, filed a petition against the construction of a bus stop on a national highway in Ranipet district. – The court was informed that the construction was being carried out without permission, potentially misusing MLA funds. – The judges noted that such constructions can cause traffic congestion and lead to accidents. – The court directed the state government to take action and file a response.

*Madras High Court* – *Judges:* Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G. Arul Murugan – *Case:* K. Vasudevan vs State of Tamil Nadu – *Date of Order:* December 3, 2025 – *Counsel:* –...

Uncategorized

*Madras High Court* – *Judges:* Chief Justice M.M. Sundresh and Justice G. Arulmurugan – *Case:* K. Vasudevan vs State of Tamil Nadu – *Date of Order:* December 3, 2025 – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: Mr. K. Selvaraj – Respondent: Not specified – *Court Observation:* The court has questioned the Tamil Nadu government on why bus stops are being constructed on national highways without permission. The court expressed concern that such unauthorized constructions can lead to traffic congestion and accidents. The court has directed the state government to take action to prevent such constructions and file a response in the matter. *Key Points:* – The petitioner, a councilor, had filed a petition against the construction of a bus stop on a national highway in Ranipet district. – The court was informed that the construction was being carried out without permission and was likely misusing MLA funds. – The judges observed that such constructions can lead to traffic congestion and accidents. – The court has directed the state government to take action and file a response in the matter.

*Madras High Court* – *Judges:* Chief Justice M.M. Sundresh and Justice G. Arulmurugan – *Case:* K. Vasudevan vs State of Tamil Nadu – *Date of Order:* December 3, 2025 – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: Mr....

*Madras High Court* – *Case:* Armstrong Murder Case – *Parties:* State (Petitioner) vs Accused Persons (Respondents) – *Date of Order:* December 3, 2025 – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: Police Department – Respondents: Not specified – *Court Observation:* The court has directed the accused persons to respond to the petition filed by the police seeking cancellation of bail granted to 12 individuals arrested in connection with the Armstrong murder case. The court has also granted interim bail to Porgodi, wife of Arkadu Suresh.

Uncategorized

*Madras High Court* – *Case:* Armstrong Murder Case – *Parties:* State (Petitioner) vs Accused Persons (Respondents) – *Date of Order:* December 3, 2025 – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: Police Department – Respondents: Not specified – *Court Observation:* The court has directed the accused persons to respond to the petition filed by the police seeking cancellation of bail granted to 12 individuals arrested in connection with the Armstrong murder case. The court has also granted interim bail to Porgodi, wife of Arkadu Suresh.

*Madras High Court* – *Case:* Armstrong Murder Case – *Parties:* State (Petitioner) vs Accused Persons (Respondents) – *Date of Order:* December 3, 2025 – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: Police Department – Respondents: Not specified –...

*Madras High Court* – *Judges:* Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G. Arul Murugan – *Parties:* Tamil Nadu Senior Advocates Forum (Petitioner) vs Union of India (Respondent) – *Date of Order:* December 3, 2025 – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: Senior Counsel AL. Somayaji and E. Om Prakash – Respondent: Additional Solicitor General AR.L. Sundaresan – *Court Observation:* The court has called for a counter affidavit from the Centre within three weeks regarding the petition challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 17, 22, and 25 of the National Sports Governance Act, 2025, which permit appeals against tribunal orders directly to the Supreme Court, bypassing High Courts.

Uncategorized

*Madras High Court* – *Judges:* Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G. Arul Murugan – *Parties:* Tamil Nadu Senior Advocates Forum (Petitioner) vs Union of India (Respondent) – *Date of Order:* December 3, 2025 – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: Senior Counsel AL. Somayaji and E. Om Prakash – Respondent: Additional Solicitor General AR.L. Sundaresan – *Court Observation:* The court has called for a counter affidavit from the Centre within three weeks regarding the petition challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 17, 22, and 25 of the National Sports Governance Act, 2025, which permit appeals against tribunal orders directly to the Supreme Court, bypassing High Courts.

*Madras High Court* – *Judges:* Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G. Arul Murugan – *Parties:* Tamil Nadu Senior Advocates Forum (Petitioner) vs Union of India (Respondent) – *Date of Order:* December 3,...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com