Follow:
Recent Posts
- Petitioner : Mr.A.L.Gandhimathi Senior CounselFor Mr.L.PalanimuthuFor R1 & R2 : Mrs.S.Premalatha, Junior St.CounselMr.R.S.BalajiSenior Standing CounselFor R3 : Mr.J.C.DurairajAddl.Govt.PleaderFor R4 : Mrs.Sameer BhuvaneshwariParty in person O R D E R The writ petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 16.02.2023 passed by the second respondent/the Tax Recovery Officer-III under Rule 11(1) of Second Schedule of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
- sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1769897257468625220?t=5og8-IWC85zuTzMpAeMv6Q&s=08[19/03, 06:53] sekarreporter1: Aa[18/03, 18:00] sekarreporter1: Contempt plea against ‘Savukku’ Shankar | Madras High Court judge kumaresh babu directs him to submit explanation https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/contempt-plea-against-savukku-shankar-madras-high-court-directs-him-to-submit-explanation/article67963548.ece[18/03, 18:21] sekarreporter1: “
- SM subramaniyam judge and Rajasekar judge full order ////// Finally, regarding the quantum of punishment, we are of the opinion that the Judicial Officers are expected to maintain high level of integrity and in the present case, the charge Nos.1 and 4 against the writ petitioner, were held proved. The proved charges, viz., charge Nos.1 and 4 are grave in nature, touching upon the integrity and honesty of the Judicial Officer. Therefore, the punishment of removal from service, cannot be construed as disproportionate to the gravity of the proved charges. Thus, we are not inclined to interfere with the quantum of punishment. Consequently, the present writ petition stands dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. The connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
- [18/03, 12:22] sekarreporter1: 👍[18/03, 13:10] sekarreporter1: தேர்தல் நன்கொடை பத்திரங்களை வழங்கிய நன்கொடையாளர்களின் பெயர் உள்ளிட்ட விவரங்களை பாரத ஸ்டேட் வங்கி, வரும் வியாழக்கிழமை மாலைக்குள் சமர்ப்பிக்க வேண்டும் என்று உச்சநீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.
- [18/03, 12:27] sekarreporter1: செந்தில் பாலாஜி தன்னை ED வழக்கிலிருந்து விடுவிக்கக் கூறிய மனு
More
Recent Posts
- Petitioner : Mr.A.L.Gandhimathi Senior CounselFor Mr.L.PalanimuthuFor R1 & R2 : Mrs.S.Premalatha, Junior St.CounselMr.R.S.BalajiSenior Standing CounselFor R3 : Mr.J.C.DurairajAddl.Govt.PleaderFor R4 : Mrs.Sameer BhuvaneshwariParty in person O R D E R The writ petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 16.02.2023 passed by the second respondent/the Tax Recovery Officer-III under Rule 11(1) of Second Schedule of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
- sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1769897257468625220?t=5og8-IWC85zuTzMpAeMv6Q&s=08[19/03, 06:53] sekarreporter1: Aa[18/03, 18:00] sekarreporter1: Contempt plea against ‘Savukku’ Shankar | Madras High Court judge kumaresh babu directs him to submit explanation https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/contempt-plea-against-savukku-shankar-madras-high-court-directs-him-to-submit-explanation/article67963548.ece[18/03, 18:21] sekarreporter1: “
- SM subramaniyam judge and Rajasekar judge full order ////// Finally, regarding the quantum of punishment, we are of the opinion that the Judicial Officers are expected to maintain high level of integrity and in the present case, the charge Nos.1 and 4 against the writ petitioner, were held proved. The proved charges, viz., charge Nos.1 and 4 are grave in nature, touching upon the integrity and honesty of the Judicial Officer. Therefore, the punishment of removal from service, cannot be construed as disproportionate to the gravity of the proved charges. Thus, we are not inclined to interfere with the quantum of punishment. Consequently, the present writ petition stands dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. The connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
- [18/03, 12:22] sekarreporter1: 👍[18/03, 13:10] sekarreporter1: தேர்தல் நன்கொடை பத்திரங்களை வழங்கிய நன்கொடையாளர்களின் பெயர் உள்ளிட்ட விவரங்களை பாரத ஸ்டேட் வங்கி, வரும் வியாழக்கிழமை மாலைக்குள் சமர்ப்பிக்க வேண்டும் என்று உச்சநீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.
- [18/03, 12:27] sekarreporter1: செந்தில் பாலாஜி தன்னை ED வழக்கிலிருந்து விடுவிக்கக் கூறிய மனு