You may also like...
-
-
Justice Anitha Sumanth held that the intimation has been received by the petitioner only on October 7, 2020, beyond the date stipulated in the proviso to Section 110(2) and the reasons for extension have also not been supplied. The counter filed by the revenue also refers to subsequent extensions granted in September which are not relevant as a counter cannot improve an order that has to either stand or fall on its own merit. —for petner senior advt mp navaneetha krishnan argued
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 21, 2021
-
Mhc Advt P Vs Girithirar: To, Mr. Dushyant Dave, Senior Advocate, President, Supreme Court Bar Association
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 16, 2020