Based on the case registered for illegal mining against M/s Olympus granites company and it’s director Durai dayanidhi , ED attached various properties purchased out of ill gotten money out of illegal mining ED made provisional attachment and on original compliant filed before the adjudicating authority atNew Delhi , the attachment made by ED was raised ,As against the same ED preferred appeal before the appellant tribunal at Delhi and same was allowed and confirmed the order of attachment made by ED. Dayanidhi and co filed CMA 688 of 2026 before high court which came up today before RSKJ and NSJ after hearing both sides the bench refuse to stay the order of appellant tribunal and adj the case by 4 weeks to file reply by Ed Regards P.Sidharthan RC and Spl PP [28/04, 14:39] sekarreporter1: Today before 2nd bench
[28/04, 14:39] sekarreporter1:
Based on the case registered for illegal mining against M/s Olympus granites company and it’s director Durai dayanidhi ,
ED attached various properties purchased out of ill gotten money out of illegal mining
ED made provisional attachment and on original compliant filed before the adjudicating authority atNew Delhi , the attachment made by ED was raised ,As against the same ED preferred appeal before the appellant tribunal at Delhi and same was allowed and confirmed the order of attachment made by ED.
Dayanidhi and co filed CMA 688 of 2026 before high court which came up today before RSKJ and NSJ after hearing both Appellant counsel N.Ramakrishnan and ED prosecutor Sidharthan ,the bench refuse to stay the order of appellant tribunal and adj the case by 4 weeks to file reply by Ed
Based on the case registered for illegal mining against M/s Olympus granites company and it’s director Durai dayanidhi ,
ED attached various properties purchased out of ill gotten money out of illegal mining
ED made provisional attachment and on original compliant filed before the adjudicating authority atNew Delhi , the attachment made by ED was raised ,As against the same ED preferred appeal before the appellant tribunal at Delhi and same was allowed and confirmed the order of attachment made by ED.
Dayanidhi and co filed CMA 688 of 2026 before high court which came up today before RSKJ and NSJ after hearing both sides the bench refuse to stay the order of appellant tribunal and adj the case by 4 weeks to file reply by Ed
Regards
P.Sidharthan
RC and Spl PP
[28/04, 14:39] sekarreporter1: Today before 2nd bench
[28/04, 14:42] Siddarth Ed Coumcil. Ed Adv: Based on the case registered for illegal mining against M/s Olympus granites company and it’s director Durai dayanidhi ,
ED attached various properties purchased out of ill gotten money out of illegal mining
ED made provisional attachment and on original compliant filed before the adjudicating authority atNew Delhi , the attachment made by ED was raised ,As against the same ED preferred appeal before the appellant tribunal at Delhi and same was allowed and confirmed the order of attachment made by ED.
Dayanidhi and co filed CMA 688 of 2026 before high court which came up today before RSKJ and NSJ after hearing both sides the bench refuse to stay the order of appellant tribunal
[28/04, 14:46] sekarreporter1: 14:46X
34%
Read Only – Save a copy to edit.
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Cause List Tuesday 28th Apr, 2026
Sr.No.
Party
No.
Petitioner Advocates
Respondent Advocates
COURT NO.02
The Honourable Mr Justice R. SURESH KUMAR The Honourable Mr. Justice N.SENTHILKUMAR
TO BE BEARD TISROUGHI VIDEO CONFERENCING / HYBRID MODE / FUTSICAL MODE ON TUESDAY THE 2011 DAY OF
APRIL 2026 AT 10.30 A.M. (Regular List)
FOR ADMISSION CMA CASES
CHA
ARK LAW ASSOCIATES
N.RAMAKRISHNAN
ADVAIDE NELAKANTTAN
MR. P. SIDHARATHAN
ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT VID COURT ORDERED
A DHAYANIDHI DHAYANIDHI ALAGIRI vs THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR AND ANOTHER.
688/2026
PRANAV MENON
ARK LAN
DATED 22.11.2024
CMP 7643/2026
A DHAYANIDHI DHAYANIDHI ALAGIRI VS DEPUTY DIRECTOR AND ANOTHER
ASSOCIATESN. RAMAKRISHNAN, ADVAIDH
NELAKANTTAN R. PRANAVR MENON,
Print View
Headings
Edit
Share
A)
Read Aloud
